The reality television program Survivor is used as a teaching tool for presenting the prisoners' dilemma. Structural similarities between the format of reality television and game theory, rule-bound competitions with clear payoff, enable students to critically examine the strategies that contestants use, providing a clear pedagogical utility.This project bridges the traditional subject matter of game theory with new trends in pedagogy that focus on the engagement with popular culture (Dreyer 2011). One of the challenges in applying game theory to classroom simulations is that it "relies on player to follow in-game incentives or it breaks down" (Ehrhardt 2008:67). This project works around this challenge by using the reality television show Survivor as a televisual text that students evaluate, since the show's producers to enforce the rules. Prisoners' Dilemma is one of the most frequently taught heuristics in introductions to international relations (IR) (Ehrhardt 2008). By analyzing patterns of cooperation and defection in the reality television show Survivor, students engage in mapping the evolution of strategy within a clearly defined, rule-bound environment with transparent payoffs and consequently discover that the rules of the game and the perception of social ability play a much larger role in alliance-making decisions than physical or strategic ability.Survivor is a reality television show in which 16 contestants participate in physical and social challenges, one (or more) being voted off the island each week. Initially divided into two tribes, and subsequently as individuals, Survivor presents an excellent source for explaining and analyzing strategic alliance and voting behavior. This project was inspired in part by Der Derian's experience teaching the Prisoners' Dilemma game to actual prisoners at Gardner State Prison: The students concluded that "traditional codes of silence, pre-scripted stories, and other intersubjective rituals of honor-all specific to their prison society-defied generalization into timeless, reductionist, instrumentalist (that is, rationalist) principles. In other words, situated, constructed identities, rather than permanent unitary