Russian and Soviet Health Care From an International Perspective 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44171-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thinking Internationally, Acting Locally: Soviet Public Health as Cultural Diplomacy in the 1920s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interwar period also provided a space for the growth of new forms of internationalism, notably in the Soviet Union and its allies. In the 1920s, the USSR's Commissariat of Public Health used its Bureau of Foreign Information to seek global endorsement of its health systems, which—like schemes of social medicine—took as a fundamental principle the significance of social factors in influencing health (Solomon, 2017, p. 194). As in Western Europe, connections existed between imperial expansion and medical hegemony: a study of Kazakhstan suggests that in central Asia, the USSR used biomedicine to entrench imperial power, facilitate economic exploitation, and erode local social structures and medical traditions (Michaels, 2003).…”
Section: The Rise Of Social Medicine In the Interwar Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interwar period also provided a space for the growth of new forms of internationalism, notably in the Soviet Union and its allies. In the 1920s, the USSR's Commissariat of Public Health used its Bureau of Foreign Information to seek global endorsement of its health systems, which—like schemes of social medicine—took as a fundamental principle the significance of social factors in influencing health (Solomon, 2017, p. 194). As in Western Europe, connections existed between imperial expansion and medical hegemony: a study of Kazakhstan suggests that in central Asia, the USSR used biomedicine to entrench imperial power, facilitate economic exploitation, and erode local social structures and medical traditions (Michaels, 2003).…”
Section: The Rise Of Social Medicine In the Interwar Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%