2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thinking more or thinking differently? Using drift-diffusion modeling to illuminate why accuracy prompts decrease misinformation sharing

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have been found to reduce the intent to share false headlines and increase the quality of information shared (Pennycook & Rand, 2022). Similar to the findings regarding the effect of warnings of false information on later truth judgments (Jalbert et al, 2020), accuracy nudges seem to be effective not necessarily because they increase how much people think about information, but rather because they change what people are thinking about, with increased consideration of the information's veracity (Lin et al, 2023).…”
Section: Attention To Truth and Accuracy Nudgessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…They have been found to reduce the intent to share false headlines and increase the quality of information shared (Pennycook & Rand, 2022). Similar to the findings regarding the effect of warnings of false information on later truth judgments (Jalbert et al, 2020), accuracy nudges seem to be effective not necessarily because they increase how much people think about information, but rather because they change what people are thinking about, with increased consideration of the information's veracity (Lin et al, 2023).…”
Section: Attention To Truth and Accuracy Nudgessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…These nudges have been found to reduce the intent to share false headlines and increase the quality of information shared (24). Similar to the findings about the effect of warnings of false information on later truth judgments (25), accuracy nudges seem to be effective not necessarily because they increase how much people think about information, but rather because they change what people are thinking about, with increased consideration of the information's veracity (26).…”
Section: Attention To Truth and Accuracy Nudgessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…To test the above possible mechanisms, we modeled our data using the DDM ( Ratcliff, 1978 ; Ratcliff and McKoon, 2008 , see also Lin et al, 2023 ). We modeled participants’ responses (‘veracity-promoting’ vs ‘veracity-obstructing’ choice) separately for each type of feedback (‘(Dis)Trust’, ‘(Dis)Like’, Baseline) and each experiment (Experiments 2 and 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%