Thinking Sex With the Great Whore 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315142166-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thinking sex with the whore of Revelation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 37 This also applies for Babylon and Jezebel; see, e.g., Breu 2020: 289-302; Carter 2009; Marshall 2009; Menéndez-Antuña 2018; Økland 2009; Selvidge 1996; Stewart 2017; Thimmes 2009; Yarbro Collins 2009. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 37 This also applies for Babylon and Jezebel; see, e.g., Breu 2020: 289-302; Carter 2009; Marshall 2009; Menéndez-Antuña 2018; Økland 2009; Selvidge 1996; Stewart 2017; Thimmes 2009; Yarbro Collins 2009. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 42 The question of how queer Revelation is, because it is ‘at odds with the normal, the legitimate, the dominant’ within the Roman Empire would make an interesting paper of its own. As this is, however, not the main focus of this article, I refer to others, who have dealt with Revelation’s relation to the Empire; see, e.g., Aymer 2005 and her term ‘alter imperial’; see also Wood 2015; Menéndez-Antuña 2018. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%