2019
DOI: 10.5937/ijcrsee1901021h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thinking styles and computer engineering training: An empirical study

Abstract: This study shows the qualitative construction of a Referential Cognitive Graduate Profile (RCGP) for the Computer Engineering program of the University of Bernardo O'Higgins (UBO) in Chile, based on the theory of Mental Self-Governance and by using three data-gathering methods: document analysis, interviews, and questionnaires, reflecting the professional competencies expected by the end of the training, set forth by both the institution and program management. The proposed model allows to contrast the differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a fairly extensive body of research on the professional characteristics of thinking styles. Many studies have been devoted to exploring the thinking styles of teachers [5][6][7], nurses and doctors [8,9], engineers and artists [10,11], farmers [12], students of various specialties [13,14], and representatives of ethnic groups [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a fairly extensive body of research on the professional characteristics of thinking styles. Many studies have been devoted to exploring the thinking styles of teachers [5][6][7], nurses and doctors [8,9], engineers and artists [10,11], farmers [12], students of various specialties [13,14], and representatives of ethnic groups [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many studies conducted within the scope of Sternberg's theory. These studies were conducted on participants with different characteristics, such as university students (Abdi, 2012;Emir, 2011;Heidari & Bahrami, 2012;Huincahue et al, 2019;Varol et al, 2014;Zarei & MierHashme, 2012), high school students (Celik & Kumral, 2016;Demir & Erginsoy-Osmanoglu, 2013), educational administrators (Balgalmis & Baloglu, 2010), teachers (Akcay, 2019;Canpolat, 2011;Saricoban & Kirmizi, 2020;Sokmen & Kılıc, 2016), university leaders (Alshammri & Alenezi, 2021), and engineers (Gridley & Cripps, 2014). Thinking styles may change with self-sufficiency, reflective thinking, thinking needs, academic performance, metacognition skills, grade level, age, undergraduate program, socioeconomic perception, parent education level, creativity, and empathy skills (Emir, 2011;Rana et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of thinking styles is most often associated with the learning process and professional activity. A number of foreign scientists' works show the importance of creative thinking and practical style of thinking activity in the educational activities of engineering students [11]. The critical style of thinking is less pronounced in students of technical and creative fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%