Thinking temporally when thinking relationally: Temporality in relational place-making

Abstract

Link to publication record in Manchester Research ExplorerCitation for published version (APA): Zhang, A. (2018). Thinking temporally when thinking relationally: temporality in relational place-making. Geoforum, 90, 91-99. https://doi. AbstractThis paper engages with relational understandings of place and place-making, and highlights the importance of attending to the temporality of place-framing/making in analyzing place politics and place-making practices. Building temporary, strategic alliance is a key step of place-making in place contestations, however, there is so far limited attention paid to the impacts of such alliance building on place-framing/making practices, especially when different actors are positioned in uneven power relations. In this paper, I use a case study of the 798 arts district in Beijing, China to demonstrate that the need of gaining politically powerful actors as allies can have substantial influences on place-framing in the first place and on subsequent place-making results. Drawing on data collected from interviews and policy and planning documents, I show that in a framing of the 798 arts district constructed by artists for saving the arts district from being demolished, the art component of the arts district was concealed, whereas components of architecture, historical significance, and city image were strategically emphasized for gaining support from the municipal government. These elements were later incorporated into the municipal government's framings of arts districts through policies and planning, but were twisted and realigned with elements like tourism and experience, which ultimately facilitates displacement of artists from the arts district. Thus, I argue, relational approach towards placeframing/making needs to be more attentive to the temporality of place-framing/making, which would allow it to more sufficiently address how various citizen-state relationships shape placemaking and to become more globally oriented.

Temporary urban uses in response to COVID-19: bolstering resilience via short-term experimental solutions

“…Lessons from the 2007-08 financial crisis suggest that a challenge will be to allow ground-breaking adaptations to continue when something approaching normality resumes. A recurring difficulty highlighted by previous studies has been the susceptibility of innovative or creative temporary uses to displacement by mainstream development once crisis conditions subside (among many examples, see Zhang, 2018). This is important because earlier research suggests that crises can help to breed creativity.…”

“It’s That Kind of Place Here”: Solidarity, Place-Making and Civil Society Response to the 2015 Refugee Crisis in Wales, UK

“…These notions are articulated through "place-frames" that "describe common experiences among people in a place, as well as imagining an ideal of how the neighborhood ought to be" (Martin, 2003, p. 733, emphasis in original). Place-frames can therefore be normative or aspirational, such that place-framing is inherently political (Zhang, 2018). They "define the scope and scale of the shared neighborhood of collective concern" (Martin, 2003, p. 733), and may be mobilized proactively to promote forms of progressive social action, or reactively against perceived threats.…”

Relational place-making in Latvian countryside: Straupe and Kaldabruņa case

“…As the place is actively made and remade through cultural, discursive and material practices [9], these views and accordingly results of place-making are flexible and continuously changing. Further development of the geographical approach towards relational place-making exactly highlights temporary aspect [10]. According to theoretical phases of place-framing -"naming/blaming, claiming, and practicing -place-frames may go through multiple rounds of re-articulation as a result of the converging or diverging interests or understandings of places among actors" [10,11].…”

“…Further development of the geographical approach towards relational place-making exactly highlights temporary aspect [10]. According to theoretical phases of place-framing -"naming/blaming, claiming, and practicing -place-frames may go through multiple rounds of re-articulation as a result of the converging or diverging interests or understandings of places among actors" [10,11]. It affirms that even if social agents involved have agreed on particular aims or practices, they need to "re-affirm" these agreements from time to time.…”