Thinking through affect: Inuit knowledge on the tundra and in global environmental politics

Abstract

Inuit residents of the Canadian Arctic balance a commitment to the land and to land-based traditions with full engagement in governance across different scales of decision-making. In this article, I suggest that thinking with and through 'affect' offers a promising approach to conceptualizing the dynamic role of Inuit knowledge across these different scales. Food sharing in remote Inuit settlements tangibly demonstrates the affective dimensions of Inuit knowledge, reflecting practices rooted in social and ethical relations with land, animals, and human community. Affect also informs the role of Inuit knowledge in international environmental negotiations. I explore this relationship in the work of the Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC), an organization that advocated for a ban on persistent organic pollutants (POP) in the negotiations leading up to the Stockholm Convention. Facilitated by the gift of an Inuit carving, ICC shared a moral and ethical perspective that helped connect negotiators to the physical harms caused by pollutants. Drawing on the philosophy of former ICC Chair Sheila Watt-Cloutier and the non-capitalist framework of J.K. Gibson-Graham (2006), I examine the role this gift played in the POPs negotiations. I conclude that thinking through affect offers new ways of conceptualizing the emergent possibilities of environmental politics and practice.Keywords: Indigenous knowledge, persistent organic pollutants, Stockholm Convention, environmental politics, the gift, food sharing, Gibson-Graham.

Environmental colonialism, digital indigeneity, and the politicization of resilience

“…Second, this discourse ensures that Indigenous knowledge systems can only function at local scales and reinforces the global hegemony of Western science in responding to and managing environmental crisis. This is important because many Indigenous knowledge systems contain normative and political values that could be leveraged to make moral arguments about what types of global action needs to be taken to address environmental change (Johnson, 2014;Leduc, 2010Leduc, , 2011Nuttall and Callaghan, 2010). For example, Inuit Qaujimaningit (IQ), the Inuit knowledge system, is a seamless and comprehensive epistemological system that does not contain divisions between spiritual, empirical, and socio-cultural forms of knowledge (Arnakak, 2002(Arnakak, , 2004Tester and Irniq, 2008).…”

Does Indigenous Knowledge Occur in and Influence Impact Assessment Reports? Exploring Consultation Remarks in Three Cases of Mining Projects in Greenland

“…29 This is also reflected by Noor Johnson, stating that "Inuit knowledge cannot be divorced from economic life, kinship, the land, animals, or emotional experience; it is fed by and feeds into each of these". 30 The Inuit Circumpolar Council, one of the six Indigenous peoples' organizations recognized as Permanent Participants in the Arctic Council, originally used the term traditional knowledge. 31 Together with the other Permanent Participants, they also agreed to use the term traditional knowledge in the work of the Arctic Council and developed the Ottawa Traditional Knowledge Principles 32 in 2015.…”

Researching the hybrid geographies of climate change: reflections from the field

“…; Roelvink and Zolkos ; Singh ). The overall challenge is to effectively account for, and in so doing to valorize and legitimate, the diverse range of climate knowledges, practices and experiences, and to recognise that what climate change means emerges through the embodied, practical engagements that people have with their environments (Johnson ; Watson and Huntington ; Bawaka Country et al . ; Burnham et al .…”