“…After confirming the complete disulfide reduction, to the same reaction the brominated peptide 5 was added under inert conditions while changing the final reaction solvent to an aqueous binary mixture H 2 O/THF with a ratio 2:1 (v/v), additionally adding triethylamine (Et 3 N) base to enable catalysis of the thio-bromo click reaction. Under these conditions, the reaction completed within 2 h and the final product, the bifunctional peptidic conjugate 6 , was obtained and subsequently purified further in a yield of 62% via preparative GPC (Figure A), a method recently exploited by our group. , Note that in the view of synthetic hurdles due to purification struggles associated with the standard purification methods, which has vexed scientists for decades, the herein exemplified preparative GPC-based method is found to be trivial for complex peptide–polymer conjugates (such as here due to the high susceptibility of the amyloidogenic peptide Aβ 17–20 to supramolecular aggregation in solution), in turn increasing the yield of the conjugate highly effective in terms of production time and cost. Figure C for the analytical GPC chromatograms evidenced the appearance of a monomodal RI trace for the peptide conjugate 6 with R v ∼ 7.65 mL ( M n,GPC = 3800 g mol –1 , Đ = 1.10), which displayed a higher molecular weight compared to that of peptide 5 ( R v ∼ 8.94 mL, M n,GPC = 750 g mol –1 , Đ = 1.06) and the in situ generated free thiolated PEG polymer 7 ( R v ∼ 8.02 mL, M n,GPC = 2400 g mol –1 , Đ = 1.07) but lower compared to that of the intermediate polymer 4 ( R v ∼ 6.86 mL, M n,GPC = 9350 g mol –1 , Đ = 1.62).…”