2019
DOI: 10.3390/polym11101640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thiol–Ene Photopolymerization: Scaling Law and Analytical Formulas for Conversion Based on Kinetic Rate and Thiol–Ene Molar Ratio

Abstract: Kinetics and analytical formulas for radical-mediated thiol–ene photopolymerization were developed in this paper. The conversion efficacy of thiol–ene systems was studied for various propagation to chain transfer kinetic rate-ratio (RK), and thiol–ene concentration molar-ratio (RC). Numerical data were analyzed using analytical formulas and compared with the experimental data. We demonstrated that our model for a thiol–acrylate system with homopolymerization effects, and for a thiol–norbornene system with visc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many conventional strategies to reduce oxygen inhibition in photoinduced polymerization: working in an inert or closed environment, increasing the photoinitiator concentration, increasing the light dose or light intensity (for reduced induction time), use of multiple photoinitiators with different rate of initiation, or addition of oxygen scavengers. Chemical mechanisms incorporate additives or suitably functionalized monomers which are insensitive to oxygen, such as the thiol-ene and thiol-acrylate-Michael additive systems (Claudino et al, 2016; Chen et al, 2019a,b). Additive enhancer monomer was proposed to improve the curing (cross-link) efficacy by either reducing the oxygen inhibition effect by stable monomer or increase the lifetime of radicals in clinical applications (Chen et al, 2019b; Wertheimer et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many conventional strategies to reduce oxygen inhibition in photoinduced polymerization: working in an inert or closed environment, increasing the photoinitiator concentration, increasing the light dose or light intensity (for reduced induction time), use of multiple photoinitiators with different rate of initiation, or addition of oxygen scavengers. Chemical mechanisms incorporate additives or suitably functionalized monomers which are insensitive to oxygen, such as the thiol-ene and thiol-acrylate-Michael additive systems (Claudino et al, 2016; Chen et al, 2019a,b). Additive enhancer monomer was proposed to improve the curing (cross-link) efficacy by either reducing the oxygen inhibition effect by stable monomer or increase the lifetime of radicals in clinical applications (Chen et al, 2019b; Wertheimer et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classically, thiol-ene photopolymerizations is carried out with UV light [105][106][107][108]. In the present case, the polymerization profiles ob tained for the copolymerization of trithiol/DVE-3 upon irradiation with a laser diode at 457 nm (100 mW/cm 2 ) or a LED bulb at 462 nm (10 mW/cm 2 ) were similar, even though the light intensity of the LED was 10 times lower than that of the laser diode (See Fig.…”
Section: Push-pull Dyesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although the mechanism for radical-mediated polymerization initiation and inhibition in dualwavelength system and the simple formulas for the associated printing speed and inhibition volume thickness [11] were reported, there is no detailed kinetics or the conversion efficacy have been theoretically reported in a dual-wavelength, thick polymer system. We have previously reported the kinetics and modeling of a single-wavelength radical-mediated photopolymerization in singleinitiator [12][13][14], two-initiator [15] and two-component system [16,17]. This study will extend our previous modeling to a 2-wavelength, 3-initiator system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…(13), and using the light intensities given by Eq. (17) are shown as follows. We will first show the conversion for the case of blue-light only, i.e., when B2=0 (no UV light) for various concentration of the initiator, C10= (0, 0.5, 1.0, 3.0) %, and coupling parameter b1 which is given by the absorption coefficient and blue-light intensity; and also the role of the crosslink rate constant (k') which gives the conversion in Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%