The origin of the
activated monomer mechanism (AMM) in cationic
ring-opening polymerization (CROP) is described first. Then, conditions
leading to the active chain end (ACE) mechanism and AMM are compared,
as well as methods allowing to distinguish between these two mechanisms.
These methods are based on the “ion trapping” of the
active ionic species using highly basic phosphines or by comparing
ACE and AMM kinetics of polymerization. The major factors deciding
on the actual mechanism include: basicity of the monomers, ring strain,
and the presence of the protic additives in the reaction system. These
factors are tabulated for major cyclic ethers and cyclic esters. The
historically evolved subsequent steps of AMM in the polymerization
of cyclic esters are described: from the first experiments with trialkyloxonium
salts, precursors of protonic acids, and added alcohols, via HCl as
catalyst, and then CF3S(O)2OH (polymerizing
lactides) to the most popular derivatives of phosphoric acid, like
diphenyl phosphate. Conditions allowing to synthesize poly(ε-caprolactone)
(PCL), according to AMM-CROP, with molar mass up to 105 g·mol–1, are described as well as methods
to polymerize CL with a protic initiator and acidic catalyst in one
molecule. Then various methods enhancing the activity of the polymerizing
systems are compared, based predominantly on hydrogen bonding, either
to the polymer active end group (usually the hydroxyl group) or to
the acid anion. Finally, kinetic equations for ACE and AMM are compared,
and it is shown that the majority of the AMM-CROP systems, mostly
studied for CL and lactides, proceed as living/controlled polymerizations.
Since polymer end groups are hydroxyl groups, then, as it was shown
in several papers, any initiator with one or many hydroxyl groups
provides macromolecules with the corresponding architecture. The papers
on synthetic methods are not discussed in detail.