2020
DOI: 10.1002/kin.21358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Third‐body” collision parameters for hydrocarbons, alcohols, and hydroperoxides and an effective internal rotor approach for estimating them

Abstract: Collision rate constants and third-body collision efficiencies are calculated for more than 300 alkanes, alcohols, and hydroperoxides, for the bath gases He, Ar, H 2 , and N 2 , and from 300 to 2000 K. The data set includes highly branched species and species with as many as 16 nonhydrogen atoms N, and it is analyzed to develop strategies for estimating collision properties more generally. Simple analytic formulas describing the Lennard-Jones collision parameters and are obtained for each of the three classes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) is likely a better estimate for a molecule the size of the HPBF adduct with 9 heavy atoms. 7 The majority of the calculations were performed for reaction with normal FA (H 2 -formic acid).…”
Section: Temperature and Pressure Dependent Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) is likely a better estimate for a molecule the size of the HPBF adduct with 9 heavy atoms. 7 The majority of the calculations were performed for reaction with normal FA (H 2 -formic acid).…”
Section: Temperature and Pressure Dependent Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcanonical transition state theory with the RRKM/ME code MESS was used to calculate temperature- and pressure-dependent rate coefficients . Collisional energy transfer parameters ⟨Δ E down ⟩, σ, and ε were calculated based on system stoichiometry and the number and types of bonds present following the methodology of Jasper . N 2 was selected as the bath gas to replicate conditions in air-aspirated internal combustion engines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, we must admit that until now, there is no generally accepted simple approach for determining the molecular collision diameter theoretically. At present, there are methods for assessing the collision diameter through only the elemental composition of the species, 5,23−26 through both spatial structure and elemental composition, 5,13,14,27 as well as via the analysis of electron density in a molecule. 11,28 Unfortunately, the approaches based on the empirical correlations of σ with atomic composition only, 23−25 which go back to the seminal works of Hirschfelder, 7 for all their simplicity, do not allow for the spatial structure of the molecules and, therefore, are applicable with confidence only for the smallest (di-and triatomic) species.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,28 Unfortunately, the approaches based on the empirical correlations of σ with atomic composition only, 23−25 which go back to the seminal works of Hirschfelder, 7 for all their simplicity, do not allow for the spatial structure of the molecules and, therefore, are applicable with confidence only for the smallest (di-and triatomic) species. The search for correlations of σ with the number of nonhydrogen atoms for hydrogen- containing compounds within homologous series also holds some promise; 5,26 however, it lacks generality. The methods for estimating the collision diameter involving the analysis of the equilibrium molecular structure 5,13,14,27 have been developed only recently but have already proven themselves well in various applications.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%