Third generation OO processes: a critique of RUP and OPEN from a project management perspective

Henderson‐Sellers, Brian; Dué, Richard T.; Graham, Ian; Collins, Georgina

doi:10.1109/apsec.2000.896730

Cited by 15 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A general comparison of RUP with OPEN and a detailed evaluation of both processes from a project management view point is available in [13]. The same authors also present a qualitative evaluation on RUP and OPEN in [14].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 97%

A reference framework for process-oriented software development organizations

Fernandes

Duarte

2005

Softw Syst Model

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, a proposal of a generic framework for process-oriented software development organizations is presented. Additionally, the respective way of managing the process model, and the instantiation of their processes with the Rational Unified Process (RUP) disciplines, whenever they are available, or with other kind of processes is suggested. The proposals made here were consolidated with experiences from real projects and we report the main results from one of those projects.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 97%

A reference framework for process-oriented software development organizations

Fernandes

Duarte

2005

Softw Syst Model

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the context of IEEE/EIA 12207 and for each of its specific areas of the life cycle, Kruchten [12] has identified the support level of the RUP: full, partial, or none. Henderson-Sellers et al [13] identify strengths and weaknesses of the RUP from a projectmanagement perspective. These areas are also pertinent when examining the RUP in the context of IEEE Std.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Software verification and validation within the (rational) unified process

Fuhrman

Djlive

Palza

28th Annual NASA Goddard Software Engineering Workshop, 2003. Proceedings.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous work in the area has presented interesting outcomes, but a tight integration of management and software processes with practical results is still an open question (Henderson-Sellers et al, 2000;Henderson-Sellers et al, 2001;Rehman & Hussain, 2007;Schwalbe, 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Integrated Model for Managerial and Productive Activities in Software Development

Callegari¹,

Rosito

Ribeiro-Júnior³

et al. 2008

Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software organizations are constantly looking for better solutions when designing and using well-defined software processes for the development of their products and services. However, many software development processes lack for more support on project management issues. This work proposes a model that integrates the concepts of PMBOK and RUP, helping process integration and assisting managers in the decision making process during project planning. We present the model and the results from a qualitative exploratory evaluation of a tool that implements the proposed model, conducted with project managers from nine companies.

show abstract

Third generation OO processes: a critique of RUP and OPEN from a project management perspective

Cited by 15 publications

References 4 publications

A reference framework for process-oriented software development organizations

A reference framework for process-oriented software development organizations

Software verification and validation within the (rational) unified process

An Integrated Model for Managerial and Productive Activities in Software Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About