Objective-To assess the effects of the vaginal contraceptive ring cycle on indices of cardiovascular health and risk by studying healthy women during the active hormone phase compared with the ring-free phase of a standard 21/7-day cycle.Design-Observational prospective cohort; 4 weeks' duration.
Setting-Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon.
Patient(s)-Twenty healthy women.Intervention(s)-Endothelial function testing using standard flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery and sublingual nitroglycerin administration. All participants underwent venous blood collection.Main Outcome Measure(s)-Endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation of the brachial artery using Doppler ultrasound imaging. Baseline levels of highdensity lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, total cholesterol, endothelin-1, and fibrinogen.
Result(s)-The active hormone phase of thevaginal ringcycle showed significantly higher vasodilation compared with the ring-free phase. The active hormone phase also showed increased fibrinogen levels compared with the ring-free phase. Low-density lipoprotein lipid levels also fluctuated and were significantly higher during the ring-free phase.
Conclusion(s)-Preliminarystudy observations of improved endothelial function and lowered low-density lipoprotein levels during the active hormone phase versus the ring-free phase suggest that the vaginal contraceptive ring has beneficial effects on vascular health in women.
KeywordsEstradiol; etonorgestrel; hormone delivery; vascular health; hormonal contraception; flowmediated dilation; progestin; estrogen Reprint requests to: Christopher T. Minson, Human Physiology, University of Oregon, 122 C Esslinger Hall, Eugene, OR 97403 (FAX: 541-346-7841; minson@uoregon.edu). B.T. has nothing to disclose. J.M. has nothing to disclose. N.M. has nothing to disclose. P.K. has nothing to disclose. C.M. has nothing to disclose.Presented at the 56th Annual Meeting, Pacific Coast Reproductive Society, Rancho Las Palmas Resort and Spa, Palm Springs, Florida, April 9-13, 2008. NIH Public Access Although decades of research have consistently shown that oral contraceptives increase the relative risk for vascular thromboembolic events (1-3), we know much less about nonoral hormonal contraceptives and cardiovascular risk. Historically, vascular thrombosis risk in oral contraceptive pills users has been associated with high oral estrogen dosing (3) and the subsequent effects of oral estrogen on coagulation pathways in the vasculature (4-8). To date, there are few data on coagulation factors and vascular function in women using nonoral hormonal contraceptives.The combination ethinyl estradiol/etonorgestrel monthly vaginal contraceptive ring is considered to be an advantageous route for hormone delivery compared with oral contraceptive pills (OCPs), because it avoids first-pass hepatic metabolism, allows for lower hormone doses, provides steady serum hormone levels, and requires less frequent administration. Compared with oral...