2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2011.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Third-order inference for autocorrelation in nonlinear regression models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we present the nonlinear regression model and describe a procedure that can be used to obtain highly accurate tail probabilities for testing first-order moving average disturbances in this model. We will follow the notation in Nguimkeu and Rekkas [1] (hereafter denoted by NR) as close as possible.…”
Section: The Model and The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we present the nonlinear regression model and describe a procedure that can be used to obtain highly accurate tail probabilities for testing first-order moving average disturbances in this model. We will follow the notation in Nguimkeu and Rekkas [1] (hereafter denoted by NR) as close as possible.…”
Section: The Model and The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These criteria are standard in the literature and have been considered, for example, by Fraser et al [18] and Chang and Wong [19]. The setup of the Monte Carlo simulation is the logistic growth model that is widely used in many applications (see [1,[20][21][22][23]). The model is defined by…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We proceed by grid search, assuming that by the end of the epidemic, the final size of the epidemic would be a fraction of the population thus setting the starting value of as . Then, using the same reasoning as in Nguimkeu and Rekkas (2011) , we can derive the starting value for as and that of as By varying the values of , (e.g. .)…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%