2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2008.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Third-order nonlinear optical properties of Bi2S3 and Sb2S3 nanorods studied by the Z-scan technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table 5, the calculated values of the (NLO) parameters πœ’ (3) and 𝑛 2 for 𝐡𝑖 2 𝑆 3 and 𝐡𝑖 2 𝑆 2.75 𝑆𝑒 0.25 are large and this can be related to the electronic and geometrical structure of these two materials. The obtained value of πœ’ (3) coefficient of the bulk 𝐡𝑖 2 𝑆 3 is larger than measured experimentally for 𝐡𝑖 2 𝑆 3 nanocrystal: 6.25 Γ— 10 βˆ’11 𝑒𝑠𝑒 [53]. This difference is due in particular to the quantum confinement effect in the nanocrystals.…”
Section: Non-linear Optical Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…From Table 5, the calculated values of the (NLO) parameters πœ’ (3) and 𝑛 2 for 𝐡𝑖 2 𝑆 3 and 𝐡𝑖 2 𝑆 2.75 𝑆𝑒 0.25 are large and this can be related to the electronic and geometrical structure of these two materials. The obtained value of πœ’ (3) coefficient of the bulk 𝐡𝑖 2 𝑆 3 is larger than measured experimentally for 𝐡𝑖 2 𝑆 3 nanocrystal: 6.25 Γ— 10 βˆ’11 𝑒𝑠𝑒 [53]. This difference is due in particular to the quantum confinement effect in the nanocrystals.…”
Section: Non-linear Optical Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…From Table 5, the calculated values of the (NLO) parameters (3) and 2 for 2 3 and 2 2.75 0.25 are large and this can be related to the electronic and geometrical structure of these two materials. The obtained value of (3) coefficient of the bulk 2 3 is larger than measured experimentally for 2 3 nanocrystal: 6.25 Γ— 10 βˆ’11 [53]. This difference is due in particular to the quantum confinement effect in the nanocrystals.…”
Section: Non-linear Optical Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The nonlinear refractive index coefficient Ξ³ we obtained is larger than those of Bi 3.25 La 0.75 Ti 3 O 12 ( Ξ³ = βˆ’1.915 Γ— 10 βˆ’12 cm 2 /W) 25, Ba 0.6 Sr 0.4 TiO 3 ( Ξ³ = 6.1 Γ— 10 βˆ’5 cm 2 /GW) 27 and Bi 2 O 3 ‐B 2 O 3 ‐TiO 2 ( Ξ³ = 8.85 Γ— 10 βˆ’14 cm 2 /W) 28. The third‐order nonlinear susceptibility Ο‡ (3) of the BZN700 Β°C thin film is larger than that of Bi 2 S 3 ( Ο‡ (3) = 6.25 Γ— 10 βˆ’11 esu) 29. As mentioned earlier, it is obvious that the real part of the third‐order nonlinear susceptibility Ο‡ (3) is larger than the imaginary part, which indicates that the nonlinearity is dominated by the nonlinear refractive behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%