Third World Environmental Justice

Schroeder, Richard A.; Martin, Kevin St.; Wilson, Bradley; Sen, Debarati

doi:10.1080/08941920802100721

Cited by 91 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Since the early 1990s, considerable emphasis has been placed on environmental equity, largely focusing on the equitable distribution of risks related to pollution and natural resource management (USEPA 1992, Schroeder et al 2008, Sikor and Stahl 2011; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Environmental Justice Advisory Council: https://www.epa.gov/ environmentaljustice/national-environmental-justice-advisory-council). Concurrently, ecosystem services have emerged as a helpful currency for evaluating ecosystem effects on human well-being, yet little effort has been made to merge these distinct but related fields.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inequity in ecosystem service delivery: socioeconomic gaps in the public-private conservation network

Villamagna¹,

Mogollón²,

Angermeier³

2017

E&S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inequity in ecosystem service delivery: socioeconomic gaps in the public-private conservation network

Villamagna¹,

Mogollón²,

Angermeier³

2017

E&S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In part, this transnationalisation reflects the mobilisation of EJ campaigns to Europe, Africa and Australasia (Schlosberg, 2007;Schroeder et al, 2008;Walker, 2009c) and the rise of transnational EJ movements and networks (Carruthers, 2008;Pellow, 2007). Studies of EJ in Europe have, for instance, considered the formation of EJMs in western as well as central and eastern Europe (Walker, 2009c;Agyeman and Ogneva-Himmelberger, 2009), the quantitative distribution of socio-environmental harm (Laurian, 2008), struggles over the distribution of toxicities (Bickerstaff and Agyeman, 2009;Davies, 2006) and the openness of environmental decision-making (Buckingham and Kulcur, environmental inequality and the political procedures through which they are mediated, the urban political ecology (hereafter UPE) literature is primarily concerned with the political-economic processes involved in the reworking of human-nonhuman assemblages and the production of socio-environmental inequalities.…”

Section: Urban Environmentalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cities, Social Cohesion and the Environment: Towards a Future Research Agenda

Cook¹,

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It will be argued in this paper that the problematic of social cohesion is also one of socio-ecological cohesion whereby the urbanisation of nature and its socioenvironmentally enabling and disabling conditions are key processes. By viewing the contradictions of the urbanisation process as intrinsically socio-ecological ones, the terrain of social cohesion is shifted both epistemologically and politically. The paper critically examines three contemporary schools of thought that consider in different ways the relationship between cities, social cohesion and the environment. It begins with a critical examination of the notion of urban sustainability. The paper will then move on to consider two approaches that emphasise issues of (in)equality and (in)justice in the urban environment, those of environmental justice and urban political ecology. The final part of the paper pinpoints four areas of research that urban researchers must examine if we are to understand more fully-and act more politically on-the nexus between cities, social cohesion and the environment.

show abstract

“…Para muitos autores a justiça ambiental está diretamente relacionada à desigualdade social (Schlosberg, 1999(Schlosberg, e 2007Schroeder;Martin;Wilson;Sen, 2008;Campello;Bezerra, 2009;Guedes;Jabace, 2015). Do mesmo modo que a justiça espacial, trata-se de uma teoria que expressa claramente como os efeitos do modo de produção hegemônico afetam de modo distinto a população.…”

Section: Justiça Socioambientalunclassified

Justiça espacial e justiça socioambiental: uma primeira aproximação

Ribeiro

2017

Estud. av.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

147urante os últimos anos o debate crítico teve a possibilidade de avançar em termos teóricos, com alguns resultados aplicados também. Talvez por isso assistimos, não sem alguma perplexidade, a reações agudas do pensamento conservador, que chegou inclusive às ruas em vários países da Amé-rica Latina, justamente onde governos progressistas conseguiram, não sem dificuldades, gerar algumas ações em prol do combate à desigualdade social, com reflexo no espaço geográfico e no acesso aos recursos naturais.Apesar do retrocesso em curso, é fundamental aguçar o debate crítico das condições de vida de grande parte da população mundial. Por isso o objetivo deste artigo é realizar uma primeira aproximação entre duas teorias muito empregadas em estudos do campo crítico e da busca da mudança social: a justiça espacial e a justiça socioambiental.Para tal, ele inicia com uma discussão sobre a justiça, parâmetro central na argumentação que iguala a todos, ao menos no campo do Direito. Depois, mergulha no urbano contemporâneo já que é na cidade que a desigualdade espacial e socioambiental ganha mais visibilidade, pois a maior parte da população mundial é urbana.Em seguida, apresenta-se uma reflexão sobre a justiça espacial e a justiça socioambiental, para concluir com aspectos comuns entre essas duas teorias críticas.

show abstract

Third World Environmental Justice

Cited by 91 publications

References 14 publications

Inequity in ecosystem service delivery: socioeconomic gaps in the public-private conservation network

Inequity in ecosystem service delivery: socioeconomic gaps in the public-private conservation network

Cities, Social Cohesion and the Environment: Towards a Future Research Agenda

Justiça espacial e justiça socioambiental: uma primeira aproximação

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About