Thirteen decades of antimicrobial copper compounds applied in agriculture. A review

Abstract

Since the initial use of Bordeaux mixture in 1885 for plant disease control, a large number of copper-based antimicrobial compounds (CBACs) have been developed and applied for crop protection. While these compounds have revolutionized crop protection in the twentieth century, their continuous and frequent use has also raised concerns about the long-term sustainability of copper (Cu)-based crop protection system. Here, we review CBACs used in crop protection and highlight their benefits and risks, and potential for their improvement and opportunities for further research to develop alternatives to CBACs. The major findings are (i) the relatively high toxicity to plant pathogens, low cost, low mammalian toxicity of the fixed Cu compounds, and their chemical stability and prolonged residual effects are major benefits of these compounds; (ii) phytotoxicity, development of copper-resistant strains, soil accumulation, and negative effects on soil biota as well as on food quality parameters are key disadvantages of CBACs; (iii) regulatory pressure in agriculture worldwide to limit the use of CBACs has led to several restrictions, including that imposed by the regulation 473/2002 in the European Union; and (iv) mitigation strategies to limit the negative effects of CBACs include their optimized use, soil remediation, and development and application of alternatives to CBACs for a sustainable crop protection. We conclude that recent research and policy efforts have led to the development of a number of alternatives to CBACs, which should be further intensified to ensure that growers have sufficient tools for the implementation of sustainable crop protection strategies.

Melatonin and Its Protective Role against Biotic Stress Impacts on Plants

“…Agricultural producers prefer to use chemical control, as it is an effective management option for many plant pests. However, the development of pathogens that are resistant to these chemicals and the effects on untargeted organisms are major environmental concerns [17]. In addition, the high expense of using these chemicals in agricultural production systems and the great impact of their residues on human health and the environment have prompted the search for control approaches that are less toxic to non-target organisms, renewable, highly biodegradable, and more economical than synthetic chemical pesticides [18].…”

The translucens group of Xanthomonas translucens: Complicated and important pathogens causing bacterial leaf streak on cereals

“…Some copper‐based bactericides or antibiotics have been recommended for controlling bacterial diseases caused by other Xanthomonas spp. (McManus et al , ; Lamichhane et al , ), but their effects on cereal Xanthomonas spp. have not been tested.…”

Biocontrol of phytobacteria with bacteriophage cocktails

“…The antibiotic resistance genes (e.g., strAB ) in these phytopathogens can undergo horizontal gene transfer resulting in the spread of antibiotic resistance. The continuous use of copper results in its accumulation in the environment, which has been linked to human health problems, toxic effects on flora and fauna, and the development of copper‐tolerant phytopathogens . Human and animal health concerns that have been associated with copper toxicity include gastrointestinal, hepatic, reproductive and neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease .…”

“…Copper oxide nanoparticles were also found to interfere with the rate of germination, and growth of roots and shoots of spring barley ( Hordeum sativum distichum) . Resistance to copper‐based bactericides is also a challenge in the control of phytopathogens . Copper resistance has been observed in several phytopathogens including Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas spp .…”