Thirteen-year randomized controlled clinical trial of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions

Peumans, Marleen; Munck, Jan De; Landuyt, Kirsten Van; Meerbeek, Bart Van

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.005

Cited by 104 publications

(109 citation statements)

References 43 publications

(55 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although many manufacturers have introduced various self-etch adhesives over the past two decades, CS has proved to be one of the most reliable ones 41) . Laboratory studies have demonstrated stable bond durability to tooth substrates 42,43) and clinical studies have also reported promising results [11][12][13][14][15][16]44) . Moreover, the manufacturers indicated that, in addition to a composition similar to that of CS, CS2 included a new integrated photo-initiator chemistry that may provide more free radicals and lead to higher monomer conversion rates and resulting in stronger bonds than CS.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, Van Meerbeek et al 11) and Kubo et al 12) have reported that no difference in clinical performance of resin composite restorations was recorded when two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan) was applied in both the presence and absence of phosphoric acid pre-etching. In addition, excellent clinical studies related to the 3, 5, 8 and 13 year follow-up of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions using two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfill SE Bond) with and without phosphoric acid pre-etching have been reported by Peumans et al [13][14][15][16] . They suggested that phosphoric acid pre-etching was not critical for the overall clinical performance of the restorations at 3 and 5 year follow-up 13,14) , and only had some minor positive effects on marginal integrity and absence of marginal discoloration at 8 and 13 year follow-up 15,16) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, excellent clinical studies related to the 3, 5, 8 and 13 year follow-up of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions using two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfill SE Bond) with and without phosphoric acid pre-etching have been reported by Peumans et al [13][14][15][16] . They suggested that phosphoric acid pre-etching was not critical for the overall clinical performance of the restorations at 3 and 5 year follow-up 13,14) , and only had some minor positive effects on marginal integrity and absence of marginal discoloration at 8 and 13 year follow-up 15,16) . Therefore, questions still remain about the effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching on the bonding performance of two-step selfetch adhesives, and further work is necessary.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability between universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives: Effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching

Suda

Tsujimoto

Barkmeier

et al. 2018

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching on enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives was investigated. Four universal adhesives and three two-step self-etch adhesives were used. The initial shear bond strengths and shear fatigue strengths to enamel with and without phosphoric acid pre-etching using the adhesives were determined. SEM observations were also conducted. Phosphoric acid pre-etching of enamel was found to increase the bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives, but its effect on two-step self-etch adhesives was material-dependent. In addition, some universal adhesives with phosphoric acid preetching showed similar bond fatigue durability to the two-step self-etch adhesives, although the bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives in self-etch mode was lower than that of the two-step self-etch adhesives. Phosphoric acid pre-etching enhances enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives, but the effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching on the bond fatigue durability of two-step self-etch adhesives was material-dependent.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability between universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives: Effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching

Suda

Tsujimoto

Barkmeier

et al. 2018

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…SE2 and XTR demonstrated stable dentin bond strengths regardless of the aging process by thermal cycling. The conventional two-step self-etch adhesive, Clearfil SE Bond (SE), has demonstrated excellent clinical performance and bonding durability 24) . SE2 is the most recent version of SE.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dentin bonding performance using Weibull statistics and evaluation of acid-base resistant zone formation of recently introduced adhesives

Guan

Takagaki

Matsui

et al. 2016

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dentin bonding durability of recently introduced dental adhesives: Clearfil SE Bond 2 (SE2), Optibond XTR (XTR), and Scotchbond Universal (SBU) was investigated using Weibull analysis as well as analysis of the micromorphological features of the acid-base resistant zone (ABRZ) created for the adhesives. The bonding procedures of SBU were divided into three subgroups: self-etch (SBS), phosphoric acid (PA) etching on moist (SBM) or dry dentin (SBD). All groups were thermocycled for 0, 5,000 and 10,000 cycles followed by microtensile bond strength testing. Acid-base challenge was undertaken before SEM and TEM observations of the adhesive interface. The etch-and-rinse method with SBU (SBM and SBD) created inferior interfaces on the dentin surface which resulted in reduced bond durability. ABRZ formation was detected with the self-etch adhesive systems; SE2, XTR and SBS. In the PA etching protocols of SBM and SBD, a thick hybrid layer but no ABRZ was detected, which might affect dentin bond durability.

show abstract

“…Historically non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) and occlusal dentin defects due to attrition have been harder to restore than class 1 and 2 stress-bearing lesions [3,4], because flex and compression can occur simultaneously on a tooth with eccentric occlusal loading [5]. Although, with the improvements in adhesive technology, NCCL restored with 2 step self-etching adhesive were recently reported to have a 96% retention rate after 13 years [6]. Restoring those lesions with materials with lower moduli of elasticity could be effective [7] since when the failure rate was higher with older bonding systems, lower modulus materials showed better clinical results [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In vitro evaluation of adhesive characteristics of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin with organic filler

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dentin Self etching a b s t r a c tObjectives. A commercial restorative material, BondfillSB (BF), is a modification of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin cement. BF uses a self-etching primer and added pre-polymerized organic fillers. We compared BF with another self-etching system, EasyBond (EB), in shear bond strength, bonded interface characteristics to human dentin and contraction gap when used in bulk-filling.Methods. Shear bond strength of BF and EB + Z100 (Z), bonded by different experience-level operators, was evaluated. Bonded interfaces were characterized by SEM, AFM, and AFM based nano-indentation. Contraction gaps (CG) at 0 h and 24 h after polymerization were evaluated for BF or EB bulk filled class I cavities. To meet the clinical recommendation, BF's powder was replaced by experimental radioopaque powder (BFO) for the CG study. EB was used with Z (EBZ) or with a resin marketed for bulk-fill base (SureFil-SDR-flow (EBSF)).Results. Shear bond strengths (Mean ± Standard Deviation (S.D.)) of BF (37.4 ± 2.6 MPa; n = 36) were higher and less variable than EBZ (18.2 ± 7.6 MPa; n = 36) (p < 0.0001, One-way ANOVA).Weibull characteristic strength (Á) differed significantly between materials (p < 0.0001) but not between operators (p = 0.90). EBZ often had non-uniform interfaces and a wider band of reduced elastic modulus (E) of greater than 20 m across the interface. BF had uniform interfaces and a smaller width of affected dentin under the interface (∼1 m). There was a difference in dentin-E between EBZ and BF up to 9 m from the interface (mixed-effects model; P = 0.03). A stratified linear regression model used for CG. EBSF and BFO showed significantly smaller CG than EBZ at time 0. None of three combinations showed any significant change between 0h-CG and 24h-CG.Significance. BF possessed bonding characteristics required to serve as a restorative.

show abstract

Thirteen-year randomized controlled clinical trial of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions

Cited by 104 publications

References 43 publications

Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability between universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives: Effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching

Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability between universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives: Effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching

Dentin bonding performance using Weibull statistics and evaluation of acid-base resistant zone formation of recently introduced adhesives

In vitro evaluation of adhesive characteristics of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin with organic filler

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About