Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations

Yazici, Arife; Antonson, SA; Kütük, Zeynep Bilge; Ergin, Esra

doi:10.2341/16-220-c

Cited by 77 publications

(137 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

103

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, the results of the current study did not correlate with a recent study conducted by Yazici et al, [14] . They found improved clinical performance of bulk fill composite in terms of marginal adaptation where there was a significant difference between bulk fill (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill) and conventional incremental fill resin composite (Filtek Ultimate) at the end of 36 months.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Two Years Clinical Evaluation of a Bulk Fill Composite Resin Compared With a Nanohybride Incremental Fill Composite Resin in Class Ιι Cavities

Attia

2018

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to determine the two years clinical performance of a bulk fill composite and conventional nanohybride incremental fill composite in class II cavities. Materials and methods:A total of 60 class Π cavities were restored with either bulk fill material (Tetric EvoCeram bulk fill) and self-etch adhesive (AdheSE adhesive) or an incremental resin composite (Tetric N-Ceram Nano-hybrid) and self-etch adhesive (AdheSE adhesive). In group Ι: The restorative material Tetric EvoCeram Bulk-Fill was applied in one bulk. In group Π: Tetric N-Ceram Nano-hybrid was applied using an incremental filling technique starting at the gingival wall. All restorations were clinically evaluated at periods of 1 week (initial recall), after six months, after one year, after eighteen months and at the end of two years. Assessment was done according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Data were statistically analyzed using Friedman test and Fisher's exact at P<0.05 level of significance. Results:There was no significant difference between group Ι and group Π regarding all tested criteria at different follow up periods; where P > 0.05. Conclusion:Bulk fill composite (Tetric EvoCeram bulk fill) and incremental fill composite resin (Tetric N-Ceram Nano-hybrid) exhibited comparable acceptable clinical performance after two years of evaluation.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Two Years Clinical Evaluation of a Bulk Fill Composite Resin Compared With a Nanohybride Incremental Fill Composite Resin in Class Ιι Cavities

Attia

2018

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…reports have assessed their durability in natural mouth conditions 7,10,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] . Among numerous parameters determining the preservation of a restoration placed in a cavity, marginal integrity and absence of leakage seem to take part as the most important.…”

Section: Scopusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Marginal integrity of flowable and packable bulk fill materials used for class II restorations —A systematic review and meta-analysis of <i>in vitro</i> studies

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review evaluates the marginal integrity of flowable and packable bulk fill composite materials placed in class II cavities. Electronic databases inclusive of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched without restriction to date. The titles and abstracts of publications gathered from database searches were screened by reviewers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. From as initial yield of 142 articles ten studies were subject to qualitative analysis. The authors emphasized that marginal integrity in enamel and dentin does not significantly differ between flowable and packable bulk fill composites used for class II restorations. Moreover, their marginal integrity was comparable to conventional resin composites with incremental techniques. The adhesive system used with a total etch technique and assessed margin located in enamel resulted in better marginal integrity.

show abstract

“…O uso de resinas compostas tornou-se bastante aceito no meio odontológico devido às suas qualidades, que incluem estética e propriedades mecânicas melhoradas. Além disso, seu preparo é mais conservador que o de restaurações com amálgama 5 . A literatura ressalta, no entanto, que embora os compósitos resinosos estejam sendo continuamente desenvolvidos para melhorar suas propriedades, a contração de polimerização ainda permanece um desafio 4 .…”

Section: Resinas Compostasunclassified

“…A tensão de contração de polimerização que se concentra na interface adesiva pode levar à degradação marginal, formação de fendas, infiltração marginal, deflexão de cúspides, cárie secundária e perda da restauração 5,6 .…”

Section: Resinas Compostasunclassified

Taxa de sucesso de restaurações com resina composta bulk-fill: Revisão de literatura / Success rate of bulk-fill composite restorations: Literature review

Soares

Pinto

2019

IDonline

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Desde a introdução das resinas compostas na Odontologia, foram evidenciadas muitas melhorias em suas propriedades. No entanto, estes materiais apresentam limitações, como a contração de polimerização, que pode resultar em fissuras de esmalte, defeito marginal, formação de fenda e microinfiltração. Para superar estas deficiências, algumas estratégias práticas incluem o uso de técnicas de inserção incremental das resinas. Porém, a mesma é demorada quando utilizada para preencher cavidades grandes e volumosas em dentes posteriores, o que tornou desejável o desenvolvimento de uma alternativa a este procedimento, e assim surgiram as resinas compostas do tipo bulk-fill, que podem ser inseridas em incrementos de 4 a 5 mm de espessura devido à sua maior translucidez. Diante deste contexto, o objetivo do presente estudo foi apresentar as taxas de sucesso das resinas bulk-fill em restaurações de dentes permanentes e decíduos, comparando ainda o resultado do seu uso em relação às resinas convencionais. A pesquisa bibliográfica foi realizada online, utilizando a ferramenta de busca Google Scholar e outras seis bases de dado eletrônicas, que são o Pubmed, Web of Sciences, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Clinical Trials–US National Institute of Health e Lilacs, sem restrição de data da publicação. Foram utilizadas as palavras-chave: “composite resin; bulk-fill composite resin; survival rate; deciduous teeth; permanent teeth”. Desta forma, foram encontrados 273 artigos que, excluindo-se os revisão de literatura, cartas ao editor e editoriais, foram reduzidos para 22 estudos a serem revisados. A lista de artigos obtida foi analisada e os artigos foram selecionados baseados nos seus títulos e resumos, de forma que foram incluídos artigos publicados em português, inglês e espanhol. Foi possível observar que há uma grande semelhança entre as resinas bulk-fill e as resinas compostas convencionais no que diz respeito às taxas de sucesso. No entanto, sugere-se que sejam realizados estudos com metodologias e amostras similares, a fim de se confirmar os resultados obtidos no presente estudo.

show abstract

Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations

Abstract: The tested bulk fill restorative resin demonstrated better clinical performance in terms of marginal discoloration and marginal adaptation.

Cited by 77 publications

References 42 publications

Two Years Clinical Evaluation of a Bulk Fill Composite Resin Compared With a Nanohybride Incremental Fill Composite Resin in Class Ιι Cavities

Two Years Clinical Evaluation of a Bulk Fill Composite Resin Compared With a Nanohybride Incremental Fill Composite Resin in Class Ιι Cavities

Marginal integrity of flowable and packable bulk fill materials used for class II restorations —A systematic review and meta-analysis of <i>in vitro</i> studies

Taxa de sucesso de restaurações com resina composta bulk-fill: Revisão de literatura / Success rate of bulk-fill composite restorations: Literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About