2022
DOI: 10.24071/llt.v25i2.4805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thirty-Two Years of Corrective Feedback in Language Teaching and Learning: A Review of the Literature

Abstract: Corrective feedback has been one of the controversial topics in second language acquisition, L2 learning, and teaching. Corrective feedback could be in written or oral forms. Much has been written and published on this debatable topic. The purpose of the current study is to review the most cited published articles from 1990 to 2022. Reviewing research on CF has several benefits. First, researchers who are interested in investigating CF gain access to a synthesized and chronological review of the topic, and it … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b. Al-Suyuti notes that the majority of grammarians (the mainstream) did not accept this view and interpreted these examples differently, either by omitting the predicate due to necessity or considering the 'waw' as an addition. c. Al-Suyuti presents a sophisticated grammatical debate on the usage of 'waw' in specific sentence structures, highlighting the divergence in opinions between renowned grammarians such as Al-Akhfash and Ibn Malik and the majority of grammarians (Mahmood, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b. Al-Suyuti notes that the majority of grammarians (the mainstream) did not accept this view and interpreted these examples differently, either by omitting the predicate due to necessity or considering the 'waw' as an addition. c. Al-Suyuti presents a sophisticated grammatical debate on the usage of 'waw' in specific sentence structures, highlighting the divergence in opinions between renowned grammarians such as Al-Akhfash and Ibn Malik and the majority of grammarians (Mahmood, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%