2017
DOI: 10.5694/mja16.00832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thirty years of the World Health Organization's target caesarean section rate: time to move on

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
40
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
40
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been 30 years since the World Health Organization released a statement warning about the high rate of cesarean sections [1] and recommending a maximum 15% rate of surgical intervention. Despite this, the United States reported an increase of 50% in cesarean sections from 1996 to 2007 [2], and other countries such as Brazil reported an overall cesarean section rate of 45% and a private practice rate of 81% [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been 30 years since the World Health Organization released a statement warning about the high rate of cesarean sections [1] and recommending a maximum 15% rate of surgical intervention. Despite this, the United States reported an increase of 50% in cesarean sections from 1996 to 2007 [2], and other countries such as Brazil reported an overall cesarean section rate of 45% and a private practice rate of 81% [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights the need to maximise all steps along the pathway of haemorrhage management so as to ensure this decision is only required in essential cases. Our caesarean section rate in this cohort was 53%, higher than the Australian or national NZ rates during the study period or the WHO‐suggested global maximum target of 20% . This has the downstream effect of making subsequent pregnancies higher risk, particularly as it relates to scar ectopics, placenta accreta and uterine rupture, all of which were represented in this cohort …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Recent analyses have suggested that while the optimal global cesarean section rate is almost 20%, attempts to reduce cesarean section rates in developed countries have not worked [13]. In China, the rate is approximately 35% [14], and the incidence of acquired diverticulum ranges from 4 to 30% and is mainly caused by poor healing following a cesarean section scars [7,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%