2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

This Examined Life: The Upside of Self-Knowledge for Interpersonal Relationships

Abstract: Although self-knowledge is an unquestioned good in many philosophical traditions, testing this assumption scientifically has posed a challenge because of the difficulty of measuring individual differences in self-knowledge. In this study, we used a novel, naturalistic, and objective criterion to determine individuals’ degree of self-knowledge. Specifically, self-knowledge was measured as the congruence between people’s beliefs about how they typically behave and their actual behavior as measured with unobtrusi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intraclass correlations (ICCs) based on a two-way random effects model were calculated for each coded behavior. Prior EAR studies have reported ICCs utilizing the 2, k method with values ranging from .12 for behaviors like reading to 1.0 for talking, reflecting two way random average ICCs across all raters, to which our values are comparable or better (e.g., 37, 38, 39). These reliabilities are typically high due to estimating the reliability for an average measure consisting of k codings—analogous to a questionnaire with x items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Intraclass correlations (ICCs) based on a two-way random effects model were calculated for each coded behavior. Prior EAR studies have reported ICCs utilizing the 2, k method with values ranging from .12 for behaviors like reading to 1.0 for talking, reflecting two way random average ICCs across all raters, to which our values are comparable or better (e.g., 37, 38, 39). These reliabilities are typically high due to estimating the reliability for an average measure consisting of k codings—analogous to a questionnaire with x items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…As such, evidence for meta-accuracy, distinctive meta-accuracy and meta-insight across contexts and levels of acquaintanceship provides more evidence that people have an impressive level of social acuity. Evidence for the Accuracy Hypothesis also adds to the growing body of work suggesting that self-knowledge is a virtue in the eyes of others (Colvin et al, 1995; Tenney, Spellman, & MacCoun, 2008; Tenney et al, 2013; Ward & Brenner, 2006). Given that meta-accuracy requires insight into one’s own behavior as well as how other people might interpret that behavior differently (Carlson & Kenny, 2012; Kenny & DePaulo, 1993), meta-accuracy might explain why people with more self-knowledge tend to be liked more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Meta-accuracy requires knowledge of one’s own behavior (Carlson & Kenny, 2012; Kenny & DePaulo, 1993), and as such, meta-accuracy might have similar interpersonal consequences as self-knowledge of behavior. People tend to like individuals more who know how they behave in everyday life, a finding that remains when controlling for the positivity of that individual’s personality (Tenney, Vazire, & Mehl, 2013). Likewise, compared to people who do not, people who do make explicit disclaimers about their flaws are liked more, suggesting that self-knowledge can attenuate the negative effects of a bad impression (Ward & Brenner, 2006).…”
Section: The Accuracy Hypothesis: Judges Enjoy Accurate Metaperceiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraclass correlations (ICCs) based on a two-way random effects model were calculated for each coded behavior. Note that prior EAR studies (Mehl, Gosling, & Pennebaker, 2006; Mehl, Vazire, Holleran, & Clark, 2010; Tenney, Vazire, & Mehl, 2013) have reported ICCs using the 2, k method, reflecting two-way random average ICCs across raters. These reliabilities tend to be high because one is estimating the reliability for an average measure consisting of k codings, akin to a questionnaire with × items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%