2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

This racket is not mine: The influence of the tool-use on peripersonal space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth to notice that HBR responses in Static condition were globally higher than the Voluntary Movement condition responses. This confirm the finding of our previous work 18 in which we showed lower HBR values in all dynamic conditions. In that occasion, we hypothesized the existence of two distinct mechanisms underlying HBR in static and dynamic conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth to notice that HBR responses in Static condition were globally higher than the Voluntary Movement condition responses. This confirm the finding of our previous work 18 in which we showed lower HBR values in all dynamic conditions. In that occasion, we hypothesized the existence of two distinct mechanisms underlying HBR in static and dynamic conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, it was shown that everyday tool use induced stably modifications to the users’ peripersonal space 10,11 . In sport context, a previous study of our group showed that the PPS of tennis players widened to include the personal racket (but not a common one), and this depended on the years of experience in their sport 18 . In the present study one might speculate that the upper limb of the boxers was a “tool” that defended the athlete from the external world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Early studies on this topic suggest that an active use of the tool is necessary for extending PPS representation. Persistence use, like in professional athletes (e.g., tennis players) or persons with disabilities (e.g., blind cane users), leads to a long-lasting incorporation of the tool into PPS even in the absence of the manipulation of the tool ( Serino et al, 2007 ; Biggio et al, 2017 ). Last, tool-induced PPS plasticity is observed whether the tool is in physical interaction with the body (hammer, rack etc.)…”
Section: Modulations Of Peripersonal Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental evidence has shown that the body schema [120] and the peripersonal space [102] (for reviews see [76,97]) can be temporarily remapped during active or passive interaction [121] with a tool. This phenomenon was originally observed in monkeys [1] (for a review see [7]), and was later described in brain damaged [8,122] and healthy humans [2,5,120,[123][124][125]. It has been suggested that modifications of the PPS underlying these effects depend on Hebbian plasticity [126][127][128], i.e., connectivity transformations driven by statistical associations of multisensory inputs from the environment.…”
Section: Incorporating Tools In the Ppsmentioning
confidence: 89%