2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thixotropic characterisation of slag modified 3D printable metakaolin based geopolymer composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metakaolin was used as a precursor in about 13% of the studies, as the sole main precursor [ [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [65] , [66] ], with slag [ 66 ] and with Callovo-Oxfordian argillites calcined at 650 °C [ 62 ]. The other precursors used were Construction and demolition waste (CDW) [ 67 , 68 ], CDW + Bark Ash [ 69 ], CDW + Metakaolin + Bark Ash [ 69 ], and Burlewash soil (montmorillonite-rich) [ 70 ] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Metakaolin was used as a precursor in about 13% of the studies, as the sole main precursor [ [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [65] , [66] ], with slag [ 66 ] and with Callovo-Oxfordian argillites calcined at 650 °C [ 62 ]. The other precursors used were Construction and demolition waste (CDW) [ 67 , 68 ], CDW + Bark Ash [ 69 ], CDW + Metakaolin + Bark Ash [ 69 ], and Burlewash soil (montmorillonite-rich) [ 70 ] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 77% of the studies used some aggregate or filler. Sand, of various origins, was the most used (92% of the studies with incorporation of aggregates/filler and 71% of all the articles) [ 10 , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , 51 , 52 , 58 , 62 , 66 , 69 , 75 ]; Studies with up to three different particle size distributions of sand were identified, with the largest particle size being 2 mm. Sand/binder ratios were observed in values up to 2.00, but most of the studies used a sand/binder ratio of 1.5 (41% of the studies that presented sand as an aggregate).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation