2020
DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00464-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoracic ultrasound for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic ultrasound in malignant pleural effusion.Articles published until December 2019 in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were screened by two authors independently to extract data and evaluate the risks of bias and applicability using the modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. We described the forest plots of each thoraci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For malignant PEs, the cytological examination obtained by ultrasound-guided thoracocentesis is the key to diagnosis, but it has variable sensitivity from 45.5% to 87.9%, depending on the type of disease [4]. Therefore, repeated specimen collection, invasive procedures such as pleural biopsy, and, ultimately, thoracoscopy are recommended for Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1293 2 of 13 improving the diagnosis if the first specimen does not provide a definitive diagnosis [5][6][7]. However, all these procedures are invasive and may be associated with complications, such as pneumothorax and bleeding [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For malignant PEs, the cytological examination obtained by ultrasound-guided thoracocentesis is the key to diagnosis, but it has variable sensitivity from 45.5% to 87.9%, depending on the type of disease [4]. Therefore, repeated specimen collection, invasive procedures such as pleural biopsy, and, ultimately, thoracoscopy are recommended for Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1293 2 of 13 improving the diagnosis if the first specimen does not provide a definitive diagnosis [5][6][7]. However, all these procedures are invasive and may be associated with complications, such as pneumothorax and bleeding [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Görg et al proved in 1997 that, with B-TUS, the detection of pleural masses could be considered characteristic of a malignant effusion [9]. Despite its high specificity, B-TUS shows low sensitivity in detecting malignant PEs [13]. One of the methods to improve the sensitivity of B-TUS for the detection of malignant thoracic pathology is the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address topics other than COVID-19, we used several previous DTA systematic reviews, including those on malignancy, 18 gastrointestinal disorders, 19 respiratory disorders, 20 emergency care, 21,22 neurology, [23][24][25] and infectious disease. 26,27 Some search data were not stored in a reusable form, and fewer records were included than those retrieved for the original studies.…”
Section: Preparation Of Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dazu gehören eine Pleuraverdickung (>1 cm), eine Zwerchfellverdickung (>7 mm) und eine Pleuraknötchenbildung [17]. Wie eine aktuelle systematische Übersichtsarbeit und Metaanalyse zeigt, ist die Thoraxsonographie jedoch nicht geeignet, um die Diagnose eines MPEs auszuschließen [18]. Die Ultraschalluntersuchung hat sich zum Standard für die dia­gnostische Pleurapunktion bei MPE entwickelt, insbesondere bei der Auswahl der Stelle, der Verringerung der Komplikationsrate und der Beurteilung der Lungenexpansion nach der Drainage [19].…”
Section: Diagnoseunclassified