2021
DOI: 10.21037/jxym-20-67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoracoscopic pleurodesis using talc poudrage versus cytotoxic drug in malignant pleural effusion: narrative review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure involves introducing a sclerosing agent into the pleural cavity to trigger an inflammatory response, leading to pleural adhesion and fibrosis. This process of obliterating the pleural cavity helps prevent MPE recurrence [ 4 ]. A variety of chemical agents can be used for pleurodesis, but a definitive consensus on the best agent has yet to be reached.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This procedure involves introducing a sclerosing agent into the pleural cavity to trigger an inflammatory response, leading to pleural adhesion and fibrosis. This process of obliterating the pleural cavity helps prevent MPE recurrence [ 4 ]. A variety of chemical agents can be used for pleurodesis, but a definitive consensus on the best agent has yet to be reached.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of chemical pleurodesis varies depending on the agent and procedure employed, making the selection of a safe and effective combination of agent and procedure critical [ 5 ]. Talc is the preferred agent according to international guidelines [ 4 ], and its superiority over alternative agents has been reported in multiple studies [ 6 - 8 ]. Additionally, previous analyses have indicated potential benefits of surgical procedures, such as a more uniform distribution of the agent [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As chemical pleurodesis treatment we preferred to use betadine over talc. The literature warns against significant side effects in using chemical pleurodesis with talc, such as fever, chest pain [20], cough, infection at the insertion of the drain, bronchospasm, allergic reaction, arrhythmias, pulmonary edema, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome [21,22]. Other studies found even more disadvantages of talc chemical pleurodesis in malignancies, such as fixation of the lung parenchyma at the level of the pleuropericardial window, which causes pericardial constriction [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%