2014
DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-0058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoracoscopic Pneumonectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Battoo and colleagues 3 found that in their single-center experience of 107 patients, of whom 67 (63%) underwent a VATS approach, there were no significant differences in perioperative complications and overall survival between VATS and open pneumonectomy. 3 Their conversion rate reported was 16%, which is similar to the conversation rate of 19% in this study. Liu and colleagues 4 also found no significant differences in perioperative complication rates between VATS and open pneumonectomy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Battoo and colleagues 3 found that in their single-center experience of 107 patients, of whom 67 (63%) underwent a VATS approach, there were no significant differences in perioperative complications and overall survival between VATS and open pneumonectomy. 3 Their conversion rate reported was 16%, which is similar to the conversation rate of 19% in this study. Liu and colleagues 4 also found no significant differences in perioperative complication rates between VATS and open pneumonectomy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The first reports demonstrating technical feasibility of thoracoscopic pneumonectomy were published in the early 1990s, but since then, studies have been limited largely to case reports. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] There have been only 2 other studies that have evaluated the outcomes of VATS versus open pneumonectomy in patients with NSCLC, 3,4 with findings similar to those reported in the present study. Battoo and colleagues 3 found that in their single-center experience of 107 patients, of whom 67 (63%) underwent a VATS approach, there were no significant differences in perioperative complications and overall survival between VATS and open pneumonectomy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7][8][9] Reports have also documented that a minimally invasive VATS approach can be used in more advanced situations, such as large and central tumors with clinically positive nodal disease and after induction therapy, as well as for sleeve resections, chest wall resections, and pneumonectomy. [10][11][12][13][14] Despite the advances and demonstrated benefits of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, a VATS approach for lobectomy has not been universally adopted. As recently as 2010, a VATS approach was used in the minority (45%) of lobectomies recorded in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases the pulmonary artery was able to be controlled safely. Using intent to treat analysis, perioperative outcomes and survival curves matched by stages were similar (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%