2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jescts.2018.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoracoscopic versus subxiphoid pericardial window in patients with end-stage renal disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,22) A small study by Salim and colleagues reported that VATS decreased the total length of hospital stay and the recurrence of pericardial effusion compared with the subxiphoid approach. 23) Several limitations to this study should be considered. The relatively small sample size and lack of a control group represent an important limitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…21,22) A small study by Salim and colleagues reported that VATS decreased the total length of hospital stay and the recurrence of pericardial effusion compared with the subxiphoid approach. 23) Several limitations to this study should be considered. The relatively small sample size and lack of a control group represent an important limitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[ 3 ] The subxiphoid approach creates an external communication only and should not be called a ‘window’ procedure as it does not create a communication between the pericardial and pleural cavities. [ 4 ] PW by anterolateral thoracotomy provides excellent drainage but, at the cost of a large and traumatic incision, a high price to pay just for access in these sick patients. On the other hand, thoracoscopic PW procedure creates a good-sized communication between the pericardial and pleural cavities in a minimally invasive manner, without the disadvantages of thoracotomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%