2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thought processes during set shot goalkicking in Australian Rules football: An analysis of youth and semi-professional footballers using Think Aloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as has been demonstrated by a small number of studies, use of the TA method appears to be feasible, at least in youths aged 13-18 years, and findings from studies that have made use of this method offer further insight into the thought processes of junior athletes and/or exercisers during task performance. For example, Elliott et al (2020) explored differences in thought processes between adult and junior Australian rules footballers during a set shot goal attempt and findings such as these could further enhance understanding of how different groups may develop and acquire skills, which would have applied implications for coaches and practitioners. Therefore, to better understand the development and acquisition of skills, more TA data needs to be collected from younger participants.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as has been demonstrated by a small number of studies, use of the TA method appears to be feasible, at least in youths aged 13-18 years, and findings from studies that have made use of this method offer further insight into the thought processes of junior athletes and/or exercisers during task performance. For example, Elliott et al (2020) explored differences in thought processes between adult and junior Australian rules footballers during a set shot goal attempt and findings such as these could further enhance understanding of how different groups may develop and acquire skills, which would have applied implications for coaches and practitioners. Therefore, to better understand the development and acquisition of skills, more TA data needs to be collected from younger participants.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have developed novel, psychological understanding across a variety of topics, including challenge and threat states (e.g., McGreary et al, 2020), stressors and coping (Nicholls & Polman, 2008; Swettenham et al, 2018; Welsh et al, 2018), and pacing and attentional focus (Whitehead et al, 2018, 2019). Furthermore, researchers have demonstrated that a strength of the TA method is its flexibility in terms of analytic approaches, with studies to date having involved quantitative approaches (e.g., McGreary et al, 2020; Swettenham et al, 2018), qualitative approaches (McGreary et al, 2021; Welsh et al, 2018; Whitehead & Jackman, 2021), and a mix of these two approaches (Elliott et al, 2020). Despite evidence of the popularity of the TA method among sport and exercise psychology researchers, attempting to capture in-event cognitions can pose significant practical challenges and may be difficult to achieve in some contexts (Eccles et al, 2006; Jackman et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, it has also been shown that planning and reasoning about one's performance as well as evaluating problems as they arise during a game matter a lot to how well very good tennis players perform on the court (McPherson, 1999). Likewise, in the performance of triathletes (Baker et al, 2005) and Australian rules footballers (Elliott et al, 2020). These examples from sports, especially elite sports where the star performers must necessarily be very good learners to get to where they are, suggest that the pedagogical design of a course ought to promote metacognitive development and enable deliberate practice concurrently.…”
Section: From Teaching Excellence To Expertise Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have termed these cognitive verbalizations (Table 1). Second, verbalizations were coded according to the sport-specific verbalizations coding scheme consisting of eight categories developed by Calmeiro and Tenenbaum (2011), subsequently applied in golf research by Whitehead et al (2016) and Birch and Whitehead (2020), as well as other sports such as Australian Rules Football (Elliott et al, 2020; see Table 2).…”
Section: Verbal Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%