2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threat detection: Behavioral practices in animals and humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
81
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
9
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These behaviors may be as benign as leg-swinging in school children who are working on a stressful math examination (23) or alarming stereotypies that may cause self-injury (24). Studies with neurologically healthy humans and animals reveal that the ritualistic behaviors that emerge under conditions of unpredictability serve as a calming response to an externally imposed stressor (25,26). Taken together, these results suggest that rituals and an insistence on sameness may be a consequence of, and a way to mitigate, anxiety arising out of unpredictability.…”
Section: The Pia Hypothesis As a Partial Account Of The Autism Phenotypementioning
confidence: 83%
“…These behaviors may be as benign as leg-swinging in school children who are working on a stressful math examination (23) or alarming stereotypies that may cause self-injury (24). Studies with neurologically healthy humans and animals reveal that the ritualistic behaviors that emerge under conditions of unpredictability serve as a calming response to an externally imposed stressor (25,26). Taken together, these results suggest that rituals and an insistence on sameness may be a consequence of, and a way to mitigate, anxiety arising out of unpredictability.…”
Section: The Pia Hypothesis As a Partial Account Of The Autism Phenotypementioning
confidence: 83%
“…For example, contrast sensitivity improves after the presentation of a threatening face, but not after the presentation of a neutral face or an upside-down threatening face (Phelps, Ling, & Carrasco, 2006). It has been argued that visible and abstract potential threats elicit different responses (Eilam, Izhar, & Mort, 2011). The defensive behavior elicited by a perceptible threat takes on three forms: freezing (to hide from the enemy's attention), fleeing (to increase the distance from the danger) or fighting (to dissuade the enemy).…”
Section: Threat-relevant Stimuli: Increased Alertness and Processing mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of risk assessment has been derived from field studies on antipredator vigilance in a wide variety of species (Bednekoff and Lima 1998;Eilam et al 2010) and from laboratory research on antipredator defense in rodents (Blanchard and Blanchard 1989;Blanchard et al 1995). In the field studies, vigilance is commonly defined in terms of searching/scanning activity and is typically measured as the tendency of an animal to scan the environment (i.e., to look around), as opposed to eating, grooming, sleeping, or other nondefensive behaviors (Lima 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, apart from scan (head-out) frequency, scanning parameters per se were rarely quantified (Krebs et al 1997), perhaps because of difficulties in their manual scoring in rodents. Nonetheless, vigilant scanning of the environment appears to be a major, and presumably the most frequently engaged, risk assessment activity in various species (Bednekoff and Lima 1998;Eilam et al 2010). As such, it needs to be more fully incorporated into the ethological analysis of rodent defensive behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%