Threat of hostile takeover and the cost of seasoned equity offerings

Abstract

PurposeThis paper investigates the relationship between a firm's susceptibility to a hostile takeover and investors' reactions to a seasoned equity offering (SEO).Design/methodology/approachThe study applies ordinary least squares (OLS) with fixed effects regression analyses to a sample of 2,517 observations from US listed companies. Event study methodology was employed to capture market reactions to the announcement of newly issued stocks. To achieve cross-sectional analyses, time variations in takeover laws allowed us to perform the desired tests across two decades of data.FindingsThe results suggest that investors react positively to the announcement of an equity offering when the threat of hostile takeover is higher. The magnitude of positive stock market reactions varies over two decades due to time series variations in takeover laws. Furthermore, the findings show that a higher hostile takeover index (HTI) score reduces investors' concerns about the inefficient usage of proceeds in acquisitions.Practical implicationsThe results demonstrate that the corporate takeover legal environment provides an important external governance mechanism through which investors' confidence increases during an SEO event. The study's empirical evidence implies that the extent of external disciplinary mechanism plays a significant role in reducing investors' uncertainty about the misuse of raised capital.Originality/valueThe exogenous fast-evolving legal environment surrounding the takeover market in the United Status allowed our study to bypass the endogeneity concerns in measuring governance strength. From the review of prior literature, this paper appears to be the first to use HTI scores to examine investors' reactions to a corporate announcement.

Do takeover threats influence corporate social responsibility? Evidence from hostile takeover vulnerability

“…Following prior research (Cain et al, 2017; Chatjuthamard et al, 2021; Ongsakul et al, 2020; Sheikhbahaei & Shams, 2021), we measure takeover vulnerability using the takeover index. Cain et al (2017) employ a hand‐collected dataset of 17 different takeover laws and court decisions in the US from 1965 through 2014 to measure the variation in takeover laws and their long‐term impact on hostile takeover activity through time.…”

Do hostile takeover threats matter? Evidence from credit ratings

“…Cain et al (2017) [9] provide more comprehensive details about the index's construction. This index is well adopted in the recent literature [13,14,[50][51][52][53].…”