1999
DOI: 10.1080/0028825x.1999.9512657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threatened and uncommon plants of New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None is likely to merit listing within one of the risk categories of de Lange et al (1999). Polystichum wawranum and P. neozelandicum subsp.…”
Section: Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None is likely to merit listing within one of the risk categories of de Lange et al (1999). Polystichum wawranum and P. neozelandicum subsp.…”
Section: Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new list updates and supersedes all previous threatened vascular plant listings (Cameron et al 1993(Cameron et al ,1995de Lange et al 1999;Hitchmough 2002) for New Zealand and remains valid from the date of publication until the next list is published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…not be considered threatened (e.g., Amphibromus fluitans, Sebaea ovata). Initial information for this revision was gathered from the previous three listings of threatened, local, and uncommon plants (Cameron et al 1993(Cameron et al , 1995de Lange et al 1999), and Flora of New Zealand volumes I-V. This information was supplemented by public submissions and expert opinion regarding the conservation status of the New Zealand indigenous flora.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations