2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-006-9140-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threatened species and the spatial concentration of humans

Abstract: Public policies that encourage high-density human living arrangements have been predicated explicitly on the assumption that certain spatial distributions of a fixed-size human population are less environmentally damaging than others. We examine the empirical validity of this assumption across 127 countries by analyzing whether the concentration of human presence in each country is related statistically to the percentage of species that were on the IUCN Red List in 2004. Our findings indicate that concentratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EKC findings for woodland, shrubland, and wetland bird populations in this study are complementary to previous EKC findings for threatened bird species (i.e., Naidoo & Adamowicz 2001;McPherson & Nieswiadomy 2005;Pandit & Laband 2007a, 2007b. Why an EKC was not found for urban and grassland bird populations, however, is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The EKC findings for woodland, shrubland, and wetland bird populations in this study are complementary to previous EKC findings for threatened bird species (i.e., Naidoo & Adamowicz 2001;McPherson & Nieswiadomy 2005;Pandit & Laband 2007a, 2007b. Why an EKC was not found for urban and grassland bird populations, however, is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In the context of our study, it follows that increases in human population density may negatively affect bird populations through habitat fragmentation and loss and positively affect bird populations through increased public awareness of habitat loss and the resulting pressure to enact conservation policies that help maintain and enhance wildlife habitat (e.g., wildlife reserves). In related studies, others have found evidence that increasing population densities tend to increase the percentage or number of threatened bird species (Kerr & Currie 1995;McKinney 2001;McKee et al 2003;Pandit & Laband 2007a). On the other hand, relationships between human population density and birds vary, depending on various modeling specifications (Dietz & Adger 2003;McPherson & Nieswiadomy 2005;Pandit & Laband 2007b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a cross-country context, a number of factors, both natural and anthropogenic, that influence species' ecological imperilment have been confirmed empirically by previous researchers (Naidoo and Adamowicz 2001;McPherson and Nieswiadomy 2005;Pandit and Laband 2007c). These include species endemism, human population density, the spatial distribution of the human population, economic conditions (per capita income), and special geographic considerations.…”
Section: Model Data and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, high numbers of people have been frequently shown to pose a threat to species (e.g., Kirkland and Ostfeld 1999;Thompson and Jones 1999;Cincotta et al 2000;Scharlemann et al 2005). Since the relation between the spatial concentration of people and presence of threatened species is likely to suffer from scaledependence and could differ amongst taxa (Pandit and Laband 2007;Pautasso 2007) there is the need for an assessment of this issue also for fungi over a range of scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%