2018
DOI: 10.1080/08854726.2017.1421019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threats to the Internal Validity of Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Healthcare

Abstract: The article defines, describes, and discusses the seven threats to the internal validity of experiments discussed by Donald T. Campbell in his classic 1957 article: history, maturation, testing, instrument decay, statistical regression, selection, and mortality. These concepts are said to be threats to the internal validity of experiments because they pose alternate explanations for the apparent causal relationship between the independent variable and dependent variable of an experiment if they are not adequat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This last design is the best in the elimination of any confounders that may influence the effect of the intervention. However, it was not used in our study due to logistic obstacles, and this might be considered as one of the study limitations given the threats to internal validity associated with the quasiexperimental designs as clarified by Flannelly et al, (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This last design is the best in the elimination of any confounders that may influence the effect of the intervention. However, it was not used in our study due to logistic obstacles, and this might be considered as one of the study limitations given the threats to internal validity associated with the quasiexperimental designs as clarified by Flannelly et al, (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e present study had several limitations. Based on a prospective quasiexperimental nonequivalent group design, selection bias of participants assigned to the control group and intervention group in different recruitment periods was inevitable in this study and might reduce the internal validity of this study [34]. In addition, many devices were able to connect to the Internet.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primary aim for current research on spirituality in the fields of psychotherapy, healthcare and pastoral care is to articulate the different ways in which practitioners can facilitate patient engagement with existential issues in order to manage suffering and distress (Klemens, 2004; Pargament, 2011). Significant outcomes for palliative care that have emerged from this increased inter-professional and disciplinary alignment have included: quality indicators that measure and document what matters (O'Reilly et al, 2016; Aslakson et al, 2017; Snowden and Telfer, 2017; Flannelly et al, 2018; Fitchett et al, 2020); clinical practice guidelines for psychosocial distress and spiritual care practice (Murillo and Holland, 2004; Bernard, 2017); as well as a number of manualized psychotherapeutic interventions (LeMay and Wilson, 2008; Marchand, 2012; Breitbart et al, 2018; Rodin et al, 2018). Relatedly, many research projects have described endeavors to help patients through letters, diaries, legacy documents, and other narrative approaches (Cooper, 2011; Emery, 2013; Sumathy, 2019) and attended to the impact that cultural and contextual diversity can have on spirituality and religiosity in supportive and palliative care (Delgado-Guay, 2014; Lopez-Sierra and Rodriguez-Sanchez, 2015; Ahluwalia et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%