2022
DOI: 10.1177/20965311221106224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Approaches to the Inquiry into Teacher Identity: A Narrative Review Enlightened by Habermas's Human Interests

Abstract: Purpose This paper attempts to review and conceptualize how different scholars approach the research on teacher identity through the lens of three human interests defined by Jürgen Habermas. Design/Approach/Methods This literature review, guided by Habermas's three human interests, illustrates the characteristics of three different approaches to the inquiry into teacher identity. Findings This paper summarizes three approaches to researching teacher identity and their characteristics, namely the technical appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Habermas is not an educationist, his work profoundly influences educational studies. For example, past studies have applied Habermas’s three interests to inspect student learning and well-being, teacher identity, leadership standards, and emancipatory educational leadership (Lovat, 2022; Liu and Yin, 2022; Romanowski, 2014), demonstrating the theory’s power in providing different and relative comprehensive research perspectives and informing researchers to “think outside the square” and go beyond one certain angle of inquiry (Lovat, 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Habermas is not an educationist, his work profoundly influences educational studies. For example, past studies have applied Habermas’s three interests to inspect student learning and well-being, teacher identity, leadership standards, and emancipatory educational leadership (Lovat, 2022; Liu and Yin, 2022; Romanowski, 2014), demonstrating the theory’s power in providing different and relative comprehensive research perspectives and informing researchers to “think outside the square” and go beyond one certain angle of inquiry (Lovat, 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%