Three cases of hearing impairment with surprising subjective improvements after prayer. What can we say when analyzing them?
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Cited by 5 publications
References 25 publications
Healing after prayer, an interdisciplinary case study This study is the result of curiosity evoked by events in general medical practice. The aim is to investigate reports of healing after prayer (HP), with the following research questions: 1. What are the medical and experiential findings? Do we find medically remarkable and/or scientifically unexplained healings? 2. Which explanatory frameworks (multidisciplinary) can help us to understand the findings? Best evidence for unexplained cures in individual cases is from Lourdes and Rome, where reported healings are meticulously investigated and reviewed by medical assessment committees. Global Medical Research Institute in the USA adopted a similar procedure. Other HP related healings were recorded by medical doctors, but without a set procedure and without confirmation by a group of medical colleagues. The research questions were investigated along several lines. - Exploration of the field (see above) - Case study research: medical data was obtained before and after prayer. An independent medical assessment team determined whether a healing could be considered as ‘medically remarkable’ or ‘unexplained’. - The participants’ experiences were studied by means of in-depth interviews, using a qualitative research methodology. - Findings were interpreted in the context of transdisciplinary discussions including medical, biopsychosocial and theological perspectives. Results 83 HP reports were received, of which 27 were selected for evaluation by the medical assessment team. None was evaluated as ‘unexplained’. However, eleven healings were considered to be ‘medically remarkable’. In particular, there were sudden cures of serious chronic diseases when the best possible prognosis would be one of gradual regression, such as Crohn’s disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease. Apart from the above the most significant finding was a similarity between the experiences accompanying many healing, whether they were evaluated as medically remarkable or not. A dominant pattern emerged: instantaneity and unexpectedness of healing, strong physical and emotional manifestations, and a sense of ‘being overwhelmed’ or ‘touched’. Not a ‘normal’ cure, but a transformative experience, interpreted as an act of God, involving the person-as-a-whole. In some instances lasting healings with gross functional improvements were found without changes in medical investigations such as scans, audiometry or coloscopy. Surprisingly the ‘objective’ measurements did not reflect functional improvements in daily life where-as ‘subjective’ experiential data did. The qualitative part of the research includes a thematic analysis of 14 in-depth interviews. For the participants their healings were much more than a repair of a bodily function. A horizontal epistemology, valuing different kinds of knowledge equally (medical, psychosocial, spiritual), is needed to understand them. Theological reflection Theology seems to have a ‘vocabulary’ for the HP experiences. There is an analogy between the instantaneous and multidimensional healing experiences in our study and the healings which occurred during the ministry of Jesus Christ and throughout the history of the church. Also, theology has an idiom articulating the experiences of the participants when they speak about their recoveries as ‘sign’, ‘gift’ or ‘act of God’ (charism). General discussion In the final chapter an attempt is made to find explanatory frameworks. Due to the nature of the results we were unable to fit the data into a biomedical model. Other perspectives were evaluated. There were similarities between what our participants said and what was found in the literature about ‘transcendent healing experiences’, ‘inscription in the lived body’ and a ‘powerful touch’. These concepts refer to intense events, occurring momentarily and with profound effects on health and personality, and to models transcending the usual mind-body duality. When positioning the HP experiences in the science-religion debate there are ample reasons for dialogue. A lot can be learnt when carefully studying and listening to these healing narratives.
Healing after prayer, an interdisciplinary case study This study is the result of curiosity evoked by events in general medical practice. The aim is to investigate reports of healing after prayer (HP), with the following research questions: 1. What are the medical and experiential findings? Do we find medically remarkable and/or scientifically unexplained healings? 2. Which explanatory frameworks (multidisciplinary) can help us to understand the findings? Best evidence for unexplained cures in individual cases is from Lourdes and Rome, where reported healings are meticulously investigated and reviewed by medical assessment committees. Global Medical Research Institute in the USA adopted a similar procedure. Other HP related healings were recorded by medical doctors, but without a set procedure and without confirmation by a group of medical colleagues. The research questions were investigated along several lines. - Exploration of the field (see above) - Case study research: medical data was obtained before and after prayer. An independent medical assessment team determined whether a healing could be considered as ‘medically remarkable’ or ‘unexplained’. - The participants’ experiences were studied by means of in-depth interviews, using a qualitative research methodology. - Findings were interpreted in the context of transdisciplinary discussions including medical, biopsychosocial and theological perspectives. Results 83 HP reports were received, of which 27 were selected for evaluation by the medical assessment team. None was evaluated as ‘unexplained’. However, eleven healings were considered to be ‘medically remarkable’. In particular, there were sudden cures of serious chronic diseases when the best possible prognosis would be one of gradual regression, such as Crohn’s disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease. Apart from the above the most significant finding was a similarity between the experiences accompanying many healing, whether they were evaluated as medically remarkable or not. A dominant pattern emerged: instantaneity and unexpectedness of healing, strong physical and emotional manifestations, and a sense of ‘being overwhelmed’ or ‘touched’. Not a ‘normal’ cure, but a transformative experience, interpreted as an act of God, involving the person-as-a-whole. In some instances lasting healings with gross functional improvements were found without changes in medical investigations such as scans, audiometry or coloscopy. Surprisingly the ‘objective’ measurements did not reflect functional improvements in daily life where-as ‘subjective’ experiential data did. The qualitative part of the research includes a thematic analysis of 14 in-depth interviews. For the participants their healings were much more than a repair of a bodily function. A horizontal epistemology, valuing different kinds of knowledge equally (medical, psychosocial, spiritual), is needed to understand them. Theological reflection Theology seems to have a ‘vocabulary’ for the HP experiences. There is an analogy between the instantaneous and multidimensional healing experiences in our study and the healings which occurred during the ministry of Jesus Christ and throughout the history of the church. Also, theology has an idiom articulating the experiences of the participants when they speak about their recoveries as ‘sign’, ‘gift’ or ‘act of God’ (charism). General discussion In the final chapter an attempt is made to find explanatory frameworks. Due to the nature of the results we were unable to fit the data into a biomedical model. Other perspectives were evaluated. There were similarities between what our participants said and what was found in the literature about ‘transcendent healing experiences’, ‘inscription in the lived body’ and a ‘powerful touch’. These concepts refer to intense events, occurring momentarily and with profound effects on health and personality, and to models transcending the usual mind-body duality. When positioning the HP experiences in the science-religion debate there are ample reasons for dialogue. A lot can be learnt when carefully studying and listening to these healing narratives.
A Dutch Study of Remarkable Recoveries After Prayer: How to Deal with Uncertainties of Explanation
This article addresses cases of remarkable recoveries related to healing after prayer. We sought to investigate how people who experienced remarkable recoveries re-construct and give meaning to these experiences, and examine the role that epistemic frameworks available to them, play in this process. Basing ourselves on horizontal epistemology and using grounded theory, we conducted this qualitative empirical research in the Netherlands in 2016–2021. It draws on 14 in-depth interviews. These 14 cases were selected from a group of 27 cases, which were evaluated by a medical assessment team at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre. Each of the participants had experienced a remarkable recovery during or after prayer. The analysis of the interviews, which is based on the grounded theory approach, resulted in three overarching themes, placing possible explanations of the recoveries within (1) the medical discourse, (2) biographical discourse, and (3) a discourse of spiritual and religious transformation. Juxtaposition of these explanatory frameworks provides a way to understand better the transformative experience that underlies remarkable recoveries. Uncertainty regarding an explanation is a component of knowing and can facilitate a dialogue between various domains of knowledge.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
Contact Info
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Product
Resources
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.
