1997
DOI: 10.1007/s003659900073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Convex Approximation by Free Knot Splines in C [0, 1]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If it is so, then there is no need in considerations given in § §5-9. This conjecture is true for k = 1, 2 as one can easily check, and our method gives a simpler proof for these cases than in [8] and [13]. For k ≥ 3, the problem is open.…”
Section: Outline Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If it is so, then there is no need in considerations given in § §5-9. This conjecture is true for k = 1, 2 as one can easily check, and our method gives a simpler proof for these cases than in [8] and [13]. For k ≥ 3, the problem is open.…”
Section: Outline Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Notice that since M k (0, 1) ⊂ C k−2 (0, 1) (see Lemma 3.1), the set S N,r ∩ M k contains functions other than k-monotone polynomials of order r only if r ≥ k. In 1995, Leviatan & Shadrin [8] and Petrov [13], independently, proved that for k = 1, 2 r ≥ k, and 0 < p ≤ ∞, there exists a constant c 0 = O(r) such that, for any f ∈ M k p , k = 1, 2, E…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For 3-monotone approximation of f ∈ ∆ 3 in the L p (quasi-) norm by cubic splines, we can achieve the best possible order of approximation (see (6)), but the location of the knots may depend on f . At the same time, we can still guarantee that the knots are not too close to each other (see (5)), which makes this result different from a constrained free-knot spline approximation (see [7] or [10]). Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…while for s ≥ max{3, r + 1}, we use a construction based on the Gauss quadrature formula (see Petrov [8] for a similar idea). Since x (s−1) is nondecreasing, for each fixed 1 ≤ i ≤ n and s 0 := [(s + 1)/2], there is a quadrature of the form…”
Section: The Upper Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%