“…Similarly, average inbreeding coefficients remained weak and much lower than 0.1 (Figure 1b), while the proportion of individuals with an individual inbreeding coefficient equal to or above 0.1 decreased (Figure 1c). In 2017, average inbreeding coefficient ( 2017 ranging from 0.0004 to 0.003; Table 2) and average mean kinship (equal to 0.008; Table 2) were generally lower than those of other, usually seen as, large conservation breeding programs, such as the golden‐headed lion tamarins Leontopithecus chrysomelas (average Mk = 0.0157; Ballou & Mace, 1990), the whooping crane Grus Americana (average Mk = 0.0325, average F = 0.0743; Boardman, Mace, Peregoy, & Ivy, 2017), the snow leopard Uncia Uncia (average Mk = 0.03, average F = 0.03; Blomqvist, 2007), or the cheetah Acinonyx jubatus (average Mk = 0.0273, average F = 0.0024; Crosier, Moloney, & Andrews, 2017). However, the 2017 captive population of houbara differed from these programs because of its size (i.e., 8648 individuals for houbara vs. 297 for the golden‐headed lion tamarins, 201 for the whooping crane, 445 for the snow leopard, and 315 for the cheetah), its number of founders (i.e., 262 for houbara vs. 83 for the golden‐headed lion tamarin, 65 for the whooping crane, 56 for the snow leopard, and 93 for the cheetah), and its strong connection to the free‐ranging population through regular collection of founders.…”