2012 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering &Amp; Economics (CIFEr) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cifer.2012.6327795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three decision making levels in portfolio management

Abstract: To improve portfolio management process we suggest using profit histories of automated trading strategies instead of actual assets. Such history can be generated by simulating hundreds of automated trading strategies (robots). We developed three-level decision making system aimed to find the portfolio weights. At the first level, virtual robots trade the assets, at the second level we create virtual profit fusion agents that calculate weighted sums of the profit series created by the first level robots. At the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ATSs [33], [34], the number of activities (autonomous trading robots, agents) N often is close or even exceeds learning set size L. Equations (14) and (15) show that effect of learning set size can be very influential if the dimensionality N is close to L. It means that, in very small learning set situations, proper estimation of the covariance matrix becomes a critical task. The situation can become even dangerous: a small increase in dimensionality can ruin the portfolio completely.…”
Section: B In-sample and Out-of-sample Standard Portfoliomentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In ATSs [33], [34], the number of activities (autonomous trading robots, agents) N often is close or even exceeds learning set size L. Equations (14) and (15) show that effect of learning set size can be very influential if the dimensionality N is close to L. It means that, in very small learning set situations, proper estimation of the covariance matrix becomes a critical task. The situation can become even dangerous: a small increase in dimensionality can ruin the portfolio completely.…”
Section: B In-sample and Out-of-sample Standard Portfoliomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In [34], the objective was directed toward developing an evolvable MAS aimed at finding the proper values of parameters just mentioned. In this approach, a multitude of "expert trading agents" based on N A input ATSs were designed and compared on the basis of training set information (N A < N).…”
Section: B Multiagent Atssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us mention some examples. In Raudys (2011, 2012), decisions of portfolio management are considered in the context of artificial intelligence. In the paper of Ramanauskas and Rutkauskas (2009), an artificial stock market is simulated by learning agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%