2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three different ABCA4 mutations in the same large family with several consanguineous loops affected with autosomal recessive cone–rod dystrophy

Abstract: A large multiplex family presumably affected with autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) was ascertained from Israel. In this family of Christian Arab ancestry with six consanguineous loops, linkage analysis failed to identify homozygosity in all six nuclear families at any of the three arCORD loci hitherto reported. However, homozygosity was found at the CORD3 locus for two nuclear families and the segregation of three distinct haplotypes at this locus in the whole pedigree suggested the alteration of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both locus and allelic heterogeneity, which are potential pitfalls in homozygosity mapping, may occur even within the same consanguineous family [Miano et al, 2000]. Similar examples were reported by Ducroq et al 2006, who found allelic heterogeneity in a large consanguineous Arab family segregating cone‐rod dystrophy due to three different mutations of ABCA4 ; by Fendri et al 2006, who found locus heterogeneity in a consanguineous Tunisian family with limb girdle muscular dystrophy; and by Lezirovitz et al 2008, who found both locus and allelic heterogeneity in a large consanguineous Brazilian pedigree segregating deafness. These observations should be taken into account, especially when studying relatively common and highly heterogeneous conditions, such as hereditary retinal degeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Both locus and allelic heterogeneity, which are potential pitfalls in homozygosity mapping, may occur even within the same consanguineous family [Miano et al, 2000]. Similar examples were reported by Ducroq et al 2006, who found allelic heterogeneity in a large consanguineous Arab family segregating cone‐rod dystrophy due to three different mutations of ABCA4 ; by Fendri et al 2006, who found locus heterogeneity in a consanguineous Tunisian family with limb girdle muscular dystrophy; and by Lezirovitz et al 2008, who found both locus and allelic heterogeneity in a large consanguineous Brazilian pedigree segregating deafness. These observations should be taken into account, especially when studying relatively common and highly heterogeneous conditions, such as hereditary retinal degeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Under this assumption, a linkage region of 2.0‐Mb extends from the telomere of chromosome 16p to marker D16S3395 . Although unusual, consanguineous families segregating two different mutant alleles have been reported (1, 2). Other possibilities for the haplotype data are that individuals IV:5 and IV:6 have hearing loss because of a mutation at a different locus or are phenocopies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, cone rod dystrophy is present in Christian families from several localities in the Galilee. In one of the villages, three mutations (c.5460?1G[A, c.5882G[A, c.3607G[A) were characterized in the ABCA4 gene among the Christian patients (Ducroq et al 2006). In the case of metachromatic leukodystrophy, five mutations in ARSA were found in seven different villages from a small geographic area in the lower Galilee among either Muslim or Christian Arab patients (Heinisch et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%