2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b06344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Adhesion Map Based on Surface and Interfacial Cutting Analysis System for Predicting Adhesion Properties of Composite Electrodes

Abstract: Using a surface and interfacial cutting analysis system (SAICAS) that can measure the adhesion strength of a composite electrode at a specific depth from the surface, we can subdivide the adhesion strength of a composite electrode into two classes: (1) the adhesion strength between the Al current collector and the cathode composite electrode (FAl-Ca) and (2) the adhesion strength measured at the mid-depth of the cathode composite electrode (Fmid). Both adhesion strengths, FAl-Ca and Fmid, increase with increas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique can measure the adhesion strength at a specic depth by cutting the electrode with a micro blade. 19,20 We found that the interfacial adhesion strength of the Si/rCu/622 was still higher than that of the Si/ fCu/622 (Si/rCu/622 ¼ 292.2 N m À1 , Si/fCu/622 ¼ 231.0 N m À1 ; Fig. S1, ESI †), but the increase of 121% was not comparable to that measured by the peel test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This technique can measure the adhesion strength at a specic depth by cutting the electrode with a micro blade. 19,20 We found that the interfacial adhesion strength of the Si/rCu/622 was still higher than that of the Si/ fCu/622 (Si/rCu/622 ¼ 292.2 N m À1 , Si/fCu/622 ¼ 231.0 N m À1 ; Fig. S1, ESI †), but the increase of 121% was not comparable to that measured by the peel test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The EMP coating depth showed that P1 + EMP of 11 μm, P5 + EMP of 10.9 μm, P0 + EMP of 9.6 μm, and P10 + EMP of 8.1 μm were measured. P10 + EMP showed the best wettability and the thinnest coating layer [23].…”
Section: Emp Coating Adhesion Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The volume fluctuations can induce a local delamination of the electrode layer from the current collector and cracking within the layer. Hence, considerable research work dealt with the determination of adhesive strength between electrode layer and substrate [17,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. However, the cohesive strength in the electrode layer has not received much attention yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%