2020
DOI: 10.1002/nag.3159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐dimensional anisotropic plasticity model for sand subjected to principal stress value change and axes rotation

Abstract: A three‐dimensional (3D) anisotropic plasticity model for sand is formulated in this study to provide a constitutive description for both radial and principal stress axes rotation (PSAR) loading‐induced behavior under various conditions with a single set of model parameters. The model has zero elastic range, with plastic loading and flow direction dependent on both current stress and stress rate direction. Fabric tensor is introduced along with its evolution to achieve anisotropic plastic modulus, dilatancy, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(194 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial fabric norm ( F 0 ) represents the degree of anisotropy and can be quantified based on advanced microscale testing methods, such as scanning electron microscopy, computed tomography (CT), and micro‐CT. F 0 = 0.4 ∼ 0.5 is generally chosen for sand prepared through the dry‐deposited method, and has been often adopted by some constitutive models 25,26,28–30,38,39,43,51 . The parameter m specifies the evolution rate of the fabric, and the other three parameters e A , λ , and k reflect the effect of fabric anisotropy on the dilatancy, strength, and degree of non‐coaxiality, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Of Elemental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial fabric norm ( F 0 ) represents the degree of anisotropy and can be quantified based on advanced microscale testing methods, such as scanning electron microscopy, computed tomography (CT), and micro‐CT. F 0 = 0.4 ∼ 0.5 is generally chosen for sand prepared through the dry‐deposited method, and has been often adopted by some constitutive models 25,26,28–30,38,39,43,51 . The parameter m specifies the evolution rate of the fabric, and the other three parameters e A , λ , and k reflect the effect of fabric anisotropy on the dilatancy, strength, and degree of non‐coaxiality, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Of Elemental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the above models, no additional loading mechanism was required in this model as the effect of non‐coaxiality was addressed by modifying the dilatancy function and plastic modulus. More recently, a zero‐elastic range anisotropic plasticity model was proposed by Xue et al., 30 to simulate the sand's behavior in the monotonic and principal stress rotational shear tests, under both drained and undrained conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, most of the existing studies focus on the individual effect of either the FC or PSR. There are a few considerations of the combined effect 27,46–50 . However, most of these studies mainly focus on the induced anisotropy behavior under the pure PSR loading conditions (principal stress rotation with fixed principal stress magnitudes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few considerations of the combined effect. 27,[46][47][48][49][50] However, most of these studies mainly focus on the induced anisotropy behavior under the pure PSR loading conditions (principal stress rotation with fixed principal stress magnitudes). There is a lack of experimental verification for their constitutive models in different undrained cyclic loading conditions including the liquefaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constitutive modeling with anisotropic plasticity for geomaterials has been and is still a very active research area. We refer to several recent research works: anisotropic viscoplastic Cam-clay model for shale by Borja et al, 62 adaptive constitutive modeling with rotational hardening by Dejaloud and Rezania, 63 anisotropic model considering fabric evolution with the aid of DEM numerical tests by Wang et al, 64 and anisotropic model applicable to change in principal stresses and their axes rotation by Xue et al 65 These studies are; however, limited to the small strain framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%