2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Benchmark Problems for Design by Advanced Analysis: Impact of Twist

Abstract: Design codes for steel structures continue to provide additional opportunities for the use of more advanced methods of nonlinear analysis. As the complexity of the analysis increases, it becomes more important for the designer to validate the capabilities of their analysis software and, just as importantly, their ability to properly utilize it. Many benchmark problems can be found in the literature; however, few include three-dimensional behavior and fewer include I-shaped sections, which are torsionally flexi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 steel (Suzuki and Lignos 2017) (Elkady and Lignos 2018b) can facilitate this effort. These agree with recent modeling recommendations on how to model complex three-dimensional behavior of steel members (Zeimian et al 2018).…”
Section: Continuum Finite Element Modeling Recommendations For Wide-fsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…50 steel (Suzuki and Lignos 2017) (Elkady and Lignos 2018b) can facilitate this effort. These agree with recent modeling recommendations on how to model complex three-dimensional behavior of steel members (Zeimian et al 2018).…”
Section: Continuum Finite Element Modeling Recommendations For Wide-fsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is not so apparent in steel columns with moderately ductile crosssections (i.e., Group A) due to the early onset of geometric instabilities after flexural yielding. The general consensus is that a thorough re-assessment of the P-M interaction curves for steel beam-columns used in seismic applications shall be conducted, which agrees with recent related work (Zeimian et al 2018). Such an assessment is outside the scope of the present paper.…”
Section: Referring Tosupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Given the first two bulleted items, the initial GIs (shape and magnitude) represent the "end product" that a modeler attempts to idealize within the CFE software, including welded base plates and fabrication work. The use of GIs in nonlinear analysis is consistent with core concepts of structural stability (Galambos 1998), which are also included in our design standards when it comes to stability verification of structural members (AISC 2016;Ziemian et al 2018).…”
Section: Final Considerations and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 75%