2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional cephalometric superimposition of the nasomaxillary complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially true if a limited number of landmarks is used, but only then the method is simple and easy (Gkantidis et al, 2015;Becker et al, 2018). Only one study investigated exclusively a landmark-based superimposition technique (Lemieux et al, 2014). This was graded as high risk of bias and applicability concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is especially true if a limited number of landmarks is used, but only then the method is simple and easy (Gkantidis et al, 2015;Becker et al, 2018). Only one study investigated exclusively a landmark-based superimposition technique (Lemieux et al, 2014). This was graded as high risk of bias and applicability concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the study has shown high risk of bias and applicability concerns. Lemieux et al (2014) evaluated the trueness of a maxillary superimposition plane using the nasomaxillary complex as reference. CBCTs of 30 growing patients were superimposed on a maxillary superimposition plane formed by the nasion, the bilateral infraorbital foramina and the incisive foramen.…”
Section: Koerich Et Al Angle Orthod (2017)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When diagnosing maxillary transverse discrepancies, the commonly used methods by clinicians include a combination of clinical and dental cast assessments that evaluates the presence of crossbite, degree of crowding, arch width measurements, perceived buccolingual inclination of teeth, and the shape and height of the palatal vault. [20][21][22] Transverse maxillary deficiency is evident in several malocclusions, class I, 23 class II, 3,13 and class III. 13 It had been found that crowded class I cases had smaller maxillary width than noncrowded cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McNamara Los cefalogramas postero-anteriores son considerados la forma más fácil y confiable de evaluar las discrepancias esqueléticas transversales 13 . Sin embargo, estas imágenes bidimensionales (2D) tienen limitaciones técnicas que afectan la precisión al momento de ubicar los puntos de referencia, generando importantes errores de identificación de los puntos craneométricos 14 .…”
Section: Revisión De La Literaturaunclassified