2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional computational prediction of cerebrospinal fluid flow in the human brain

Abstract: A three-dimensional model of the human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spaces is presented. Patient-specific brain geometries were reconstructed from magnetic resonance images. The model was validated by comparing the predicted flow rates with Cine phase-contrast MRI measurements. The model predicts the complex CSF flow patterns and pressures in the ventricular system and subarachnoid space of a normal subject. The predicted maximum rostral to caudal CSF flow in the pontine cistern precedes the maximum rostral to ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
91
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wall effects of pulsatile CSF flow in the ventricular space have received little attention so far. Biological studies in animal or in vitro models have mostly focused on flow and WSS induced by the cilia alone [4,26], whereas macroscopic flows have been approached predominantly from a neurosurgical [27,29,30], radiological [31][32][33] or biomedical [15][16][17][18]20] point of view, mostly without interest in WSS or near-wall dynamics. In point of fact, WSS estimates from radiological studies are limited by the near-wall resolution, whereas numerical investigations have been limited by underlying model assumptions, including simplified geometries, steady flows, neglected wall motion, choroid plexus pulsations or cilia action.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wall effects of pulsatile CSF flow in the ventricular space have received little attention so far. Biological studies in animal or in vitro models have mostly focused on flow and WSS induced by the cilia alone [4,26], whereas macroscopic flows have been approached predominantly from a neurosurgical [27,29,30], radiological [31][32][33] or biomedical [15][16][17][18]20] point of view, mostly without interest in WSS or near-wall dynamics. In point of fact, WSS estimates from radiological studies are limited by the near-wall resolution, whereas numerical investigations have been limited by underlying model assumptions, including simplified geometries, steady flows, neglected wall motion, choroid plexus pulsations or cilia action.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are known to produce pulsatile CSF flow with velocities several orders of magnitude larger than those generated by the cilia [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Vice versa, none of the investigations of large-scale CSF dynamics has taken into account the effect of cilia motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow velocities at the boundaries reported by the simplified model were too low by a factor of two at minimum, and consequently, the validity of the entire flow and pressure field of the accurate model that depended on these boundary conditions was jeopardized. In 2011, Sweetman et al proposed a model of the entire CSF space as an expansion of their previous 2D and 3D work on the cranial compartments [41][42][43]. The authors took a distinctly different approach than Howden et al, in that they prioritized the scope of the model over detail of the individual modules.…”
Section: Ventricular Spacementioning
confidence: 96%
“…8.3.1 [41][42][43]. In a pair of papers published in 2009 and 2010, my group investigated flow in an anatomically accurate representation of a healthy cranial SAS and fourth ventricle [3,4].…”
Section: Cranial Subarachnoid Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suspended particles are ignored, as typical diameters of red blood cells (7.6 m) and platelets (2.5 m) [35] are small relative to the size of the blood vessel (3 -4 mm). Blood is assumed to be an incompressible, Newtonian fluid [36], with density and dynamic viscosity being taken as 1060 kg·m -3 and 0.0035 kg·m…”
Section: Fluid Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%