2012
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional delayed-detonation models with nucleosynthesis for Type Ia supernovae

Abstract: We present results for a suite of fourteen three-dimensional, high resolution hydrodynamical simulations of delayed-detonation models of Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) explosions. This model suite comprises the first set of three-dimensional SN Ia simulations with detailed isotopic yield information. As such, it may serve as a database for Chandrasekhar-mass delayeddetonation model nucleosynthetic yields and for deriving synthetic observables such as spectra and light curves. We employ a physically motivated, stoch… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

48
812
3
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 496 publications
(866 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
48
812
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A slightly off-centre ignition may accomplish some more mixing, so some Fe group elements could end up in the outer parts of the ejecta, while keeping a well-defined Si-rich shell. The 3D delayed detonation models from Seitenzahl et al (2013) have a stratification of the outer part of the ejecta in fair agreement with what is inferred from our model of SN 1991T. In particular, the models with few ignition spots show a larger production of 56 Ni at the expenses of IMEs.…”
Section: Comparison With Explosion Modelssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A slightly off-centre ignition may accomplish some more mixing, so some Fe group elements could end up in the outer parts of the ejecta, while keeping a well-defined Si-rich shell. The 3D delayed detonation models from Seitenzahl et al (2013) have a stratification of the outer part of the ejecta in fair agreement with what is inferred from our model of SN 1991T. In particular, the models with few ignition spots show a larger production of 56 Ni at the expenses of IMEs.…”
Section: Comparison With Explosion Modelssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Under this approximation, the mass ratio we measure here is roughly twice the corresponding 57 Fe/ 56 Fe ratio measured for the Sun (Asplund et al 2009). This value is slightly higher than the predictions of near-M Ch explosion models: W7 of Iwamoto et al (1999) predicts 1.7 times Solar, the pure turbulent deflagration models of Fink et al (2014) predict ∼1.5 times Solar, the delayeddetonation models of CO WDs of Seitenzahl et al (2013) predict ∼1.3 times Solar, the delayed-detonation models of WDs with carbon-depleted cores of Ohlmann et al (2014) predict ∼1.1 times Solar, and the gravitationally confined detonation models of Meakin et al (2009) …”
Section: Expected 57 Co Yields From Sn Ia Explosion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…There is a trend that models with larger progenitor metallicity (see Seitenzahl et al 2013) and models that experience enhanced in situ neutronization (e.g., W7) yield higher 57 Ni/ 56 Ni ratios. This is naturally explained by the fact that 57 Ni is a neutron-rich isotope (28 protons, 29 neutrons) and its production relative to the self-conjugate 56 Ni (28 protons, 28 Figure 3.…”
Section: Expected 57 Co Yields From Sn Ia Explosion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Such iron clumps are expected to form in the deflagration to detonation explosion model (Seitenzahl et al 2013). Our results are presented in section 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%