2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
37
2
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
37
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This was expected because CBCT is a direct imaging technique, thereby effectively eliminating the errors that may arise from the alginate impression and plaster model production stage. Three studies [11][12][13] selected by Luu et al, 10 comparing the CBCT and plaster models, exhibited noticeably lower discrepancy than the results presented in this study; however, they reported that two of the 12,13 used CBCT capturing images of impressions instead of direct imaging technique, thus not accounting for the possible errors that may have resulted during the process of making impression and plaster models. However, it is important to note that despite the relatively high mean differences, all mean differences found between the laser-scanned models and plaster models to CBCT scans were below the clinically relevant threshold of 0.5 mm, 10 with the exception of two mandibular interpremolar measurements.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was expected because CBCT is a direct imaging technique, thereby effectively eliminating the errors that may arise from the alginate impression and plaster model production stage. Three studies [11][12][13] selected by Luu et al, 10 comparing the CBCT and plaster models, exhibited noticeably lower discrepancy than the results presented in this study; however, they reported that two of the 12,13 used CBCT capturing images of impressions instead of direct imaging technique, thus not accounting for the possible errors that may have resulted during the process of making impression and plaster models. However, it is important to note that despite the relatively high mean differences, all mean differences found between the laser-scanned models and plaster models to CBCT scans were below the clinically relevant threshold of 0.5 mm, 10 with the exception of two mandibular interpremolar measurements.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…This is consistent with previous studies. 2,3,10,11 Mean differences when comparing laser-scanned digital models and plaster models to the CBCT scans were higher than those between the laser-scanned models and plaster models. This was expected because CBCT is a direct imaging technique, thereby effectively eliminating the errors that may arise from the alginate impression and plaster model production stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moshiri et al (11) mostraram a confiabilidade da cefalométria radiográfica feita em imagens adquiridas com TCCB. Brown et al (12) num estudo sobre medidas ósseas lineares concluíram que a TCCB pode ser usada para tais propósitos, idêntica conclusão que El-Zanatyet al (6) sobre o uso da mesma para avaliação de medidas do arco dental.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Com a finalidade de verificar a confiabilidade das medidas de arco dentário El-Zanaty et al (6) compararam as medidas obtidas em modelos gesso de 34 pacientes ortodônticos medidas com um paquímetro digital com as medidas feitas por um programa de computador específico nas imagens obtidas pela tomografia digital cone Beam. As medidas avaliadas foram o comprimento do arco, largura do arco, profundidade do arco, profundidade do palato e largura mesio-distal dos dentes.…”
Section: Revisão De Literaturaunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation