2011
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional displays and stereo vision

Abstract: Procedures for three-dimensional image reconstruction that are based on the optical and neural apparatus of human stereoscopic vision have to be designed to work in conjunction with it. The principal methods of implementing stereo displays are described. Properties of the human visual system are outlined as they relate to depth discrimination capabilities and achieving optimal performance in stereo tasks. The concept of depth rendition is introduced to define the change in the parameters of three-dimensional c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the qualitative impression of depth and 3-dimensionality when viewing real scenes or stereoscopic images with both eyes is more compelling; there is a vivid sense of immersive negative space, tangible solid objects, and realness. This perceptual impression (stereopsis) is conventionally attributed to processing of binocular disparities to derive depth and 3D form (Ponce and Born, 2008; Westheimer, 2011; Wheatstone, 1838). However, there have been wide-ranging reports of the impression of stereopsis in the absence of binocular disparities, specifically when viewing a pictorial image with one eye through a reduction aperture (Ames, 1925; Koenderink, 1998; Michotte, 1991, 1948; Schlosberg, 1941; Vishwanath and Hibbard, 2013; da Vinci, cited in Wade et al, 2001; Wheatstone, 1838; see caption Figure 1), suggesting that it is not uniquely tied to processing of disparities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the qualitative impression of depth and 3-dimensionality when viewing real scenes or stereoscopic images with both eyes is more compelling; there is a vivid sense of immersive negative space, tangible solid objects, and realness. This perceptual impression (stereopsis) is conventionally attributed to processing of binocular disparities to derive depth and 3D form (Ponce and Born, 2008; Westheimer, 2011; Wheatstone, 1838). However, there have been wide-ranging reports of the impression of stereopsis in the absence of binocular disparities, specifically when viewing a pictorial image with one eye through a reduction aperture (Ames, 1925; Koenderink, 1998; Michotte, 1991, 1948; Schlosberg, 1941; Vishwanath and Hibbard, 2013; da Vinci, cited in Wade et al, 2001; Wheatstone, 1838; see caption Figure 1), suggesting that it is not uniquely tied to processing of disparities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some displays need additional viewing aids, such as polarizing, shutter, or anaglyph glasses to separate the images. Methods that do not depend on viewing aids (autostereoscopic displays) use alternate narrow strips containing the images for the left and the right eyes and deviating their optical paths for each eye [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zone Y represents the zone in which the user observes a double image but can still roughly perceive depth. When the crossing point is located in zone Z, the user observes a double image and in general cannot determine the depth location …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the crossing point is located in zone Z, the user observes a double image and in general cannot determine the depth location. 1 For stereoscopic display applications, it is important to know the range of the binocular disparity for zone X. To determine this range, Panum's fusional area experiments have been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%