2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional distinct element modeling of fault reactivation and induced seismicity due to hydraulic fracturing injection and backflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe that the microseismic events from these three stages are all far away from the perforation locations. The multistage events overlap and converge into a microseismic event band, which conforms to the characteristics of fault activation [34][35][36][37][38]. The microseismic event band coincides with fault #1 spatially, and its extension direction is also consistent with the strike of fault #1.…”
Section: Geomechanical Probability Analysismentioning
confidence: 67%
“…We observe that the microseismic events from these three stages are all far away from the perforation locations. The multistage events overlap and converge into a microseismic event band, which conforms to the characteristics of fault activation [34][35][36][37][38]. The microseismic event band coincides with fault #1 spatially, and its extension direction is also consistent with the strike of fault #1.…”
Section: Geomechanical Probability Analysismentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In this study, slip nodes are considered to be seismic slip only if they satisfy two conditions: (1) the Coulomb failure stress is greater than 0.2 MP, and (2) the slip velocity is greater than 0.2 mm/s. The ΔCFS threshold guarantees that rock failure occurs within the defined area, while the critical velocity threshold prevents slow creep and aseismic slip [27,56].…”
Section: Calculation Of Seismic Slip Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum magnitude of seismic activities occurs during the injection phase of the fracturing fluid. Even small stress changes during the production flowback phase reactivate the faults and generate a large number of seismicity events [26,27]. Based on laboratory and field experiments on the permeability and frictional properties of faults [28], it is possible that stress changes during the fracturing process could induce fault reactivation, leading to long-distance fault slips [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and Dontsov (2018) used the BDEM to study the 3D fracture propagation and proppant transport in a layered reservoir considering the influencing of stress distribution. Yin et al (2020) investigated the fault reactivation and induced seismicity caused by hydraulic fracturing using the BDEM. Zheng et al (2022) explored the effect of fracturing fluid viscosity and injection rate on the vertical propagation of hydraulic fracture in shale reservoirs with developed bedding planes.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%