2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Facial Simulation in Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Validation Study of 100 Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same authors evaluated Maxilim performances for soft-tissue simulation in 100 patients underwent BSSO for mandibular advancement [23]. As in the previous case, the accuracy of the simulation was assessed with two methods, a 3D cephalometric analysis and a 3D distance map for the entire face and for specific regions of interest.…”
Section: Work Based On Maxilim Software (3d)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same authors evaluated Maxilim performances for soft-tissue simulation in 100 patients underwent BSSO for mandibular advancement [23]. As in the previous case, the accuracy of the simulation was assessed with two methods, a 3D cephalometric analysis and a 3D distance map for the entire face and for specific regions of interest.…”
Section: Work Based On Maxilim Software (3d)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This builds on the work of Liebregts et al, who showed that surfaces acquired from pre- and postoperative CT images can be used to plan mandibular advancement surgery (Liebregts et al, 2015a, b). Their study accurately predicted soft tissue changes postsurgery and was validated in another paper published by this group using the same technique to plan bimaxillary correction (Liebregts et al, 2015a, b). These papers provide important evidence supporting virtual planning of surgery but are limited to nonsyndromic adults and adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The following procedure is feature extraction, which converted the input data into feature vectors. And then, we will train different models on the training set and evaluated by 10-fold cross validation as well as Split to Equal validation (SEV) [30], [31]. Finally, the trained model will be validated on independent test data, and then 5 metrics would be used to evaluate the performance of predictors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%